February 13, 2019
All amounts expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated
The ringing of the opening bell at the NYSE heralded the beginning of trading int he shares of the new company and was performed by Barrick’s executive chairman, John Thornton, accompanied by the president and CEO, Mark Bristow. Photo courtesy of NYSE.
TORONTO — Barely six weeks after its merger with Randgold, Barrick is making good progress in achieving its short-term priority goals as well as its full year objectives, president and CEO Mark Bristow said here today.
Bristow, who has already visited most of the group’s operations in the Americas, some of them twice, said one of his first priorities had been to establish regional executive teams for North America, Latin America, and Africa and the Middle East. These are now in place and are already making a significant impact on the way Barrick operates.
[Here are Barrick’s Q4 2018 results, and Randgold’s Q4 2018 results.]
He announced that Barrick’s production guidance for 2019 was between 5.1 and 5.6 million ounces of gold and between 375 and 430 million pounds of copper. During 2019, the reserves and resources of newly-acquired Randgold will be combined with Barrick’s on the basis of common calculation criteria, and will be reported on that basis at the end of the year.
Turning to the operations, the higher cost of sales1 guidance for gold in 2019, of $880-$940 per ounce and all-in sustaining costs2 guidance of $870-$920 per ounce, primarily reflects the planned completion of mining at the comparatively high-grade, low-cost Cortez Hills open pit in the first half of the year. Lower costs at Turquoise Ridge, as well as the addition of lower-cost production from Loulo-Gounkoto and Kibali, are expected to partially offset this impact in 2019. Higher grades, improved efficiencies, and tight cost discipline are expected to reverse this trend over the next two to three years.
Bristow said the Nevada assets, including Turquoise Ridge, were now being operated as a single complex, and were already delivering efficiencies. Still in Nevada, the recent Fourmile discovery has now been combined with the nearby Goldrush in a single project which has the potential to become Barrick’s next Tier One3 gold mine. Shaft sinking and construction at Turquoise Ridge is also on track, and along with a focus on improved efficiencies and cost discipline, it too has the potential for Tier One status.
In Argentina, a concerted effort to drive Veladero back to Tier One status is under way as Barrick looks to expand its Latin American business. At Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic, a scoping study and pilot plant support the expansion of what is already one of the world’s largest open pit gold mines. Bristow said there was a renewed focus on exploration across the group’s Latin American portfolio.
The core African assets—the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in Mali, and Kibali in the Democratic Republic of Congo—continue to reinforce their Tier One status, and both are maintaining the grade of their reserves. The feasibility study on the Massawa project in Senegal has been completed, and an application for a mining permit has been submitted to the government.
Bristow said the company was continuing to engage in constructive discussions with the Tanzanian government on the impasse regarding Acacia, and noted that it was in the interest of all stakeholders, including the government, to find a solution to this issue.
On the new business front, Bristow said Nevada was a destination with enormous upside through brownfield extensions, new discoveries, and combination opportunities with other operators in the area. The recently-announced strategic alliance with, and additional investment in, Reunion Gold opens up a new frontier for Barrick in the Guiana Shield. Exploration continues across the group’s global portfolio.
Similarly, work continues on the rationalisation of the group asset portfolio. Bristow said the identification and sale of non-core assets would be based on a carefully-considered and value-based process.
“The new Barrick has a unique ability to grow three-dimensionally: through its large and high-quality exploration portfolio and geological capability; the brownfields extension potential at its existing operations; and new projects destined to become Tier One mines,” Bristow said.
“This growth will be driven and directed by a management team with a mix of skills and experience that few other gold mining companies can match. In the short time that we’ve been together, the combined team has already made great progress in applying Randgold’s proven strategy to a new global group that I am confident will soon earn its place as the industry’s most valued company.”
2019 Operating and Capital Expenditure Guidance
| GOLD PRODUCTION AND COSTS |
| | Production (000s ounces) | Cost of sales1 ($ per ounce) | Cash costs2 ($ per ounce) | All-in sustaining costs2 ($ per ounce) |
| Barrick Nevada4 | 1,750 - 1,900 | 920 - 970 | 640 - 690 | 850 - 900 |
| Pueblo Viejo (60%) | 550 - 600 | 780 - 830 | 465 - 510 | 610 - 650 |
| Loulo-Gounkoto (80%)5 | 520 - 570 | 800 - 850 | 575 - 625 | 810 - 850 |
| Kibali (45%)5 | 330 - 350 | 890 - 940 | 555 - 605 | 670 - 730 |
| Kalgoorlie (50%) | 280 - 300 | 920 - 970 | 740 - 790 | 920 - 960 |
| Turquoise Ridge (75%) | 270 - 310 | 655 - 705 | 550 - 600 | 680 - 730 |
| Tongon (89.7%)5 | 250 - 270 | 945 - 995 | 710 - 760 | 780 - 820 |
| Porgera (47.5%) | 240 - 260 |
980 - 1,030 | 800 - 850 | 985 - 1,025 |
| Veladero (50%) | 230 - 250 | 1,250 - 1,350 | 770 - 820 | 1,150 - 1,250 |
| Hemlo | 200 - 220 | 890 - 940 | 765 - 815 | 1,100 - 1,200 |
| Acacia (63.9%) | 320 - 350 | 920 - 970 | 665 - 710 | 860 - 920 |
| Other Sites6 | 190 - 250 | 1,075 - 1,165 | 895 - 945 | 1,055 - 1,115 |
| Total Gold5,7,8,9 | 5,100 - 5,600 | 880 - 940 | 650 - 700 | 870 - 920 |
| | | | | |
| COPPER PRODUCTION AND COSTS |
| | Production (millions of pounds) | Cost of sales ($ per pound) | C1 cash costs10 ($ per pound) | All-in sustaining costs10 ($ per pound) |
| Lumwana | 210 - 240 | 2.25 - 2.50 | 1.80 - 2.10 | 2.75 - 3.15 |
| Zaldívar (50%) | 120 - 130 | 2.40 - 2.70 | 1.65 - 1.85 | 2.00 - 2.20 |
| Jabal Sayid (50%) | 45 - 60 | 2.00 - 2.30 | 1.60 - 1.90 | 1.60 - 1.90 |
| Total Copper9 | 375 - 430 | 2.30 - 2.70 | 1.70 - 2.00 | 2.40 - 2.90 |
| | | | | |
| CAPITAL EXPENDITURES | | | |
| Mine site sustaining | 1,100 - 1,300 | | |
| Project | 300 - 400 | | |
| Total Attributable Capital Expenditures11 | 1,400 - 1,700 | | |
2019 Outlook Assumptions
| | 2019 Guidance Assumption | Hypothetical Change | Impact on Revenue (millions) | Impact on Cost of sales (millions) | Impact on All-in sustaining Costs2 |
| Gold revenue, net of royalties | $1,250/oz | +/- $100/oz | +/- $535 | +/- $17 | +/- $3/oz |
| Copper revenue, net of royalties | $2.75/lb | +/- $0.50/lb | +/- $201 | +/- $18 | +/- $0.04/lb |
Note #1
Cost of sales applicable to gold per ounce is calculated using cost of sales applicable to gold on an attributable basis (removing the non-controlling interest of 40% Pueblo Viejo, 36.1% Acacia, 40% South Arturo, 20% Loulo-Gounkoto and 10.3% of Tongon from cost of sales), divided by attributable gold ounces sold. Cost of sales applicable to copper per pound is calculated using cost of sales applicable to copper including our proportionate share of cost of sales attributable to equity method investments (Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid), divided by consolidated copper pounds sold (including our proportionate share of copper pounds sold from our equity method investments).
Note #2
“Cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “Cash costs” per ounce starts with cost of sales applicable to gold production, but excludes the impact of depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales, and includes by-product credits. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce begin with “Cash costs” per ounce and add further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. Barrick believes that the use of “cash costs” per ounce and “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce will assist investors, analysts and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “Cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Although a standardized definition of all-in sustaining costs was published in 2013 by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 26 gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick), it is not a regulatory organization, and other companies may calculate this measure differently. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Note #3
A Tier One Gold Asset is a mine with a stated life in excess of 10 years with 2017 production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and 2017 total cash cost per ounce within the bottom half of Wood Mackenzie’s cost curve tools (excluding state-owned and privately-owned mines). For purposes of determining Tier One Gold Assets, Total cash cost per ounce is based on data from Wood Mackenzie as of August 31, 2018. The Wood Mackenzie calculation of Total cash cost per ounce may not be identical to the manner in which Barrick calculates comparable measures. Total cash cost per ounce is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Total cash cost per ounce should not be considered by investors as an alternative to operating profit, net profit attributable to shareholders, or to other IFRS measures. Barrick believes that Total cash cost per ounce is a useful indicator for investors and management of a mining company’s performance as it provides an indication of a company’s profitability and efficiency, the trends in cash costs as the company’s operations mature, and a benchmark of performance to allow for comparison against other companies. Wood Mackenzie is an independent third party research and consultancy firm that provides data for, among others, the metals and mining industry. Wood Mackenzie does not have any affiliation to Barrick.
Note #4
Reflects production and sales from Goldstrike, Cortez, and South Arturo on a 60% basis, which reflects our equity share.
Note #5
2019 forecast cost of sales does not include the impact of the Randgold purchase price allocation.
Note #6
Includes Lagunas Norte, Golden Sunlight and Morila on a 40% basis.
Note #7
Operating unit guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating unit, and may not add up to the corporate-wide guidance range total. Guidance ranges exclude Pierina, which is mining incidental ounces as it enters closure.
Note #8
Total gold cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce include the impact of hedges and/or costs allocated to non-operating sites.
Note #9
Includes corporate administration costs.
Note #10
“C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “C1 cash costs” per pound is based on cost of sales but excludes the impact of depreciation and royalties and includes treatment and refinement charges. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound begins with “C1 cash costs” per pound and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs and royalties. Barrick believes that the use of “C1 cash costs” per pound and “all-in sustaining costs” per pound will assist investors, analysts, and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing copper, understanding the economics of copper mining, assessing our operating performance, and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are intended to provide additional information only, do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Further details on these non-GAAP measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Note #11
These amounts include our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo and South Arturo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our 89.7% share of Tongon, our 63.9% share of Acacia and our 50% share of Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid.
Goldrush and Fourmile Projects Combined With Potential for Tier One Status
Ongoing exploration within the Horse Canyon/Cortez Unified Exploration Plan in Nevada has identified and extended ore grade mineralization such that the Goldrush and Fourmile resource areas are coalescing on the same geological trend. The two are now being treated as one project which has increased the optionality for this project and the potential to become another Tier One mine for Barrick within the footprint of the Cortez district.
Goldrush-Fourmile: Our Next Potential Tier One Mine1
- Delivered initial inferred resource of 1.167Mt @ 18.58 g/t at Fourmile within significantly mineralized footprint
- Open mineralization
- Integrating latest discovery with Goldrush2
- See Appendix A for additional details including assay results for the significant intercepts.
- Probable reserves: 2 Moz (6.4Mt at 9.7 g/t); indicated resources: 9.35Moz (30.9 Mt @ 9.4g/t); inferred resources (including Fourmile): 3.55Moz (11.9Mt @ 9.3g/t).
- Collar location shown for all holes intersecting 5g/t or greater gold driled to targeted strats falling outside deposit and mineralized footprints.
While the geological, geotechnical and geo-metallurgical aspects of the mineralized corridor are being reviewed, ongoing development of the twin exploration declines at Goldrush will provide access to the heart of the orebody for further drilling and the conversion of resources to reserves. The exploration declines can be converted to production declines later.
Rod Quick, Barrick’s mineral resource management and evaluation executive, confirmed that the project’s feasibility study is currently scheduled for completion in early 2020, although the latest developments have afforded the feasibility team the opportunity to re-evaluate and optimize the project design, on the back of the increased resources. Current indicated mineral resources outside of reserves stand at 30.9Mt at 9.4g/t for 9.35 million ounces and a further 11.9Mt at 9.3g/t for 3.55 million ounces in the inferred category4. Current probable reserves on the Redhill portion of project stand at 6.4Mt at 9.7g/t for 2.0 million ounces4.
Rob Krcmarov, executive vice-president exploration and growth, says the project has demonstrated the enormous potential of the Cortez region, which has historically produced more than 24 million ounces, and has 10.7 million ounces of reserves and 12.5 million ounces of M&I resources and a significant mineral inventory yet to be defined4. Barrick believes it could deliver further discoveries of a similar size to Goldrush, and therefore while continuing to explore the area, the company is also evaluating increasing processing capacity in the region.
Appendix A – Fourmile Significant Intercepts1
Drill Results Highlighted in Q4 2018 Presentation
| Core Drill Hole2 | Azimuth | Dip | Interval (m) | Width (m)3 | Au (g/t) |
| FM18-43D | 14 | -87 | 909.5 - 910.7 | 1.2 | 5.0 |
| 916.8 - 918.3 | 1.5 | 5.4 |
| 932.4 - 935.4 | 3.0 | 10.6 |
| 957.7 - 960.7 | 3 | 18.8 |
| FM18-44D | 92 | -86 | 1,079.3 - 1,083.1 | 3.8 | 11.6 |
| FM18-47D | 151 | -83 | 627.3 - 628.8 | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| 772 - 776.6 | 4.6 | 60.9 |
| 779.5 - 781.3 | 1.8 | 11.7 |
| FM18-48D | 119 | -83 | 1,102.8 - 1,105.8 | 3 | 17.6 |
| FM18-49D | 84 | -86 | 921.1 - 922 | 0.91 | 16.8 |
| 957.7 - 978.1 | 20.4 | 54.1 |
| FM18-52D | 62 | -83 | 873.1 - 899 | 25.9 | 34.6 |
| 935.6 - 956.9 | 21.3 | 30.2 |
- All intercepts calculated using a 5g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.8m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width.
- Fourmile drill hole nomenclature: FM (Fourmile) followed by the year (18 for 2018).
- True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage.
The drilling results for the Fourmile property contained in this press release have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Fourmile property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.
Solar Hybrid Plant for Loulo-Gounkoto
As part of its cost-reduction program and drive to manage its carbon footprint, Loulo is to install a 24MW off-grid solar hybrid plant to support its existing 63MW thermal power station, by harnessing Mali’s abundant solar resource.
The 24MW off-grid solar plant has the potential of saving 10 million liters of fuel a year while reducing Loulo’s annual carbon emissions by 42,000 tonnes.
This renewable energy project is part of Barrick’s strategy of moving away from thermal power in Africa, where lack of infrastructure means that many mines need to rely on self-generated diesel energy, making this their largest cost item.
Utilizing hydropower in the Democratic Republic of Congo, grid power in Côte d’Ivoire, and heavy-fuel baseload generators in Mali, Barrick has already cut its energy costs significantly, and the continuing roll-out of renewable energy sources will ensure that its future needs are met in the most cost-efficient and environmentally friendly manner.
The solar feasibility study forecasts that the photovoltaic plant will replace 50,000MWh/y of thermal generation, saving 10 million liters of fuel per year and reducing CO² emissions by 42,000 tonnes over the same period. The introduction of the solar component will cut the complex’s energy cost by around 2 cents/kWh.
Construction of the project—which meets Barrick’s investment criteria of 20% IRR—will start later this year, and it is scheduled for commissioning in late 2020. The plant will use the latest weather prediction models, which will enable the power management system to switch between thermal and solar without compromising the micro-grid.
Automation Drives Mining Into the Future
Autonomous production systems and projects throughout Barrick are being advanced as the group focuses on becoming the global leader in mining efficiency.
Chief executive Mark Bristow says to achieve its goal of being the world’s most valued gold company, in a rapidly evolving environment where the industry’s shift to developing countries will continue, Barrick will have to be at the leading edge of automation.
“Kibali in the Democratic Republic of Congo is currently at the forefront, with its mission control system which manages the underground ore handling logistics without human intervention from the surface, but across Barrick there are many automated operations and developments which are now being unified in a group strategy,” he says.
These include underground drills that can be run from surface during shift changes; automated underground and open pit haulage trucks; fully autonomous backfill systems; remote-controlled open pit drills; and autonomous drilling of development and production blast holes by multiple units controlled by a single remote operator.
Glenn Heard, senior vice president mining, says ongoing projects currently cover five main areas: underground development and production drilling, production and haulage, and open pit haulage and production.
“At present all our systems have barriers which prevent human access to the autonomous operating zones. Our next big step will be to create a situation where autonomous and manned units can work together seamlessly within the same active areas, and we’re working with Sandvik and other providers to achieve this,” he says.
Lumwana Seeks Long-Term Partnership with Zambian Government
Barrick, owners of the Lumwana copper mine, says it is continuing to engage with the Zambian government and community stakeholders about a mutually-beneficial way forward for the operation.
Subsequent to the first Lumwana board meeting following the Barrick/Randgold merger, Barrick’s chief operating officer for Africa and the Middle East, Willem Jacobs, said the company was mindful that the Government was under pressure to increase its revenue. At the same time, however, its proposed tax changes would put Lumwana in a challenging situation.
“The proposed changes to taxes and royalties would imperil the mine’s ability to sustain returns to all stakeholders, such as the significant contribution of more than $3.3 billion it has already made to the Zambian economy over the past 10 years,” Jacobs said.
“Lumwana has made detailed proposals to the Government about a partnership approach which would provide the State with an improved share in the economics of Lumwana without overburdening the mine. Finding a win-win solution between the industry and Government would without doubt increase investor confidence in Zambia and safeguard the long-term prospects of its mining industry.”
Jacobs said media reports that Barrick had sold Lumwana were untrue, but given the challenging conditions the mine was facing, all options would have to be considered.
Willow Creek to Reopen to the Public
The Willow Creek Reservoir Restoration Project, designed to create a natural spawning habitat for fish and to provide a recreational resource for the surrounding communities, is nearing completion and will reopen to the public early this year.