Home  >  Investors  >  Annual Meeting  >  Information Circular  >  Schedules

2024 DIGITAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR (Interactive Proxy Statement)

Ready to cast your vote?

Registered Shareholders Vote Now
Non-Registered Shareholders Vote Now

Schedules

Other Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Barrick has two compensation plans under which Barrick Shares are authorized for issuance: the 2004 Plan and the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan (the Amended and Restated Plan, and collectively with the 2004 Plan, the Option Plans). In 2007, shareholder and regulatory approval was obtained for amendments to the 2004 Plan.

The purpose of the Option Plans is to provide key individuals and consultants of the Company and its subsidiaries with compensation opportunities that encourage share ownership and enhance our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel. The Option Plans are designed to reward significant performance achievements.

The Company’s directors are eligible to receive options to acquire Barrick shares under the Amended and Restated Plan, but no options have been granted to non-executive directors since 2003. No options have been granted from the Amended and Restated Plan since 2015. Non-executive directors are not eligible to participate in the 2004 Plan, and no options have been granted from the 2004 Plan since 2013. In 2013, the Compensation Committee decided to cease granting options as a component of executive compensation going forward. None of the NEOs have outstanding stock options and, as of March 20, 2024, there are no outstanding options under the Amended and Restated Plan or the 2004 Plan, taking into account options that have been exercised, forfeited, or cancelled.

The Compensation Committee administers the Option Plans. All grants of options are subject to approval by the Board.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2023 and March 1, 2024 regarding Barrick Shares issuable upon the exercise of options under each of our Option Plans, as well as the number of Barrick Shares available for issuance under each such plan.

Equity Compensation Plans

   Option Plans
   Approved by
   Shareholders

Number of Barrick Shares
to be Issued on Exercise of
Outstanding Options

(a)

Weighted Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options

(b)

Number of Barrick Shares
Available for Future Issuance Under
Option Plans

(c)

As at
December 31,
2023

As at
March 1,
2024

As at
December 31,
2023

As at
March 1,
2024

As at
December 31,
2023

As at
March 1,
2024

   Amended and
   Restated Plan

Nil

Nil

N/A

N/A

6,480,212

6,480,212

   2004 Plan

Nil

Nil

N/A

N/A

7,604,512

7,604,512

 
Key Features of our Option Plans

 

Amended and Restated Plan

2004 Plan

Maximum Number of Barrick Shares Issuable

35,000,000 Barrick Shares.

16,000,000 Barrick Shares.

Total Barrick Shares Issued and
Issuable as of March 1, 2024

22,488,288 Barrick Shares, or 1.27% of the Company’s issued share capital, of which no Barrick Shares are currently issuable on the exercise of outstanding options.(1)

8,395,488 Barrick Shares, or 0.48% of the Company’s issued share capital, of which no Barrick Shares are currently issuable on the exercise of outstanding options.(2)

Options Available for Issue as of
March 1, 2022

6,480,212 options available for grant, or 0.37% of the Company’s issued share capital.

7,604,512 options available for grant, or 0.43% of the Company’s issued share capital.

Options Issued in 2023

No options were issued in 2023.

No options were issued in 2023.

Issuance Limits

The total number of Barrick Shares to be optioned to any optionee together with any Barrick Shares reserved for issuance to such optionee and his or her associates under options or other share compensation arrangements may not exceed 1% of the number of Barrick Shares on the date of the grant.

The total number of Barrick Shares to be optioned to any optionee together with any shares reserved for issuance to such optionee and his or her associates under options or other share compensation arrangements may not exceed 1% of Barrick Shares on the date of grant.

In addition, the 2004 Plan (a) limits the aggregate number of Barrick Shares issuable to our insiders under any of our share compensation plans to not greater than 10% of our issued and outstanding Barrick Shares and (b) limits the number of Barrick Shares issued to our insiders in any one year period under any of our share compensation plans to not greater than 10% of our issued and outstanding Barrick Shares.

  1. As of March 1, 2024, 22,244,288 Barrick Shares had been issued pursuant to options granted under the Amended and Restated Plan, representing 1.27% of the Company’s outstanding capital as of that date. As of December 31, 2023, there were no options outstanding to purchase Barrick Shares under the Amended and Restated Plan, taking into account options that have been exercised, forfeited, or cancelled.
  2. As of March 1, 2024, 8,395,488 Barrick Shares had been issued pursuant to options granted under the 2004 Plan, representing 0.48% of the Company’s outstanding capital as of that date. As of December 31, 2023, there were no options outstanding to purchase Barrick Shares under the 2004 Plan, taking into account options that have been exercised, forfeited, or cancelled.

Key Terms and Conditions of the Amended and Restated Plan

Maximum Option Term

10 years from date of grant.

Exercise Price

The exercise price of each option granted under the Amended and Restated Plan is determined by the Compensation Committee. Each option granted has an exercise price not less than the closing price of Barrick Shares on the TSX on the last trading day before the day the option is granted.

Vesting and Exercise of Options

Generally, options do not vest immediately. The Committee’s practice has been to grant options having a term of 10 years, vesting over a period of four years. The Amended and Restated Plan contains standard provisions permitting accelerated vesting for executive officers and other members of management who are entitled to Change in Control benefits under the Company’s Change in Control Plan.

Transfer and Assignment

Options granted are not assignable, except that in the event of an optionee’s death, options may be exercised in accordance with their terms by appropriate legal representatives.

Expiry of Options

Options may be exercised only for so long as the optionee remains an employee, subject to certain exceptions, including death or termination of employment other than for cause.

If, before the expiry of an option in accordance with its terms, the employment of the optionee terminates for any reason other than termination by the Company for cause, but including termination by reason of the death of the optionee, then the option may be exercised within three months of the date of termination of employment or death of the optionee, but only to the extent that the optionee was entitled to exercise such option at the date of the termination of employment or death of the optionee. However, in the case of the optionee’s death, the Committee may in its discretion extend the time in which the optionee’s legal representative can exercise an option to a date that does not exceed the original expiration date of the option.

 

Termination and Amendments

The Board may at any time terminate the Amended and Restated Plan and may amend such plan in such respects as the Board deems appropriate, subject to regulatory or shareholder approval where required, provided that amendments or termination may not alter or impair options previously granted under the Amended and Restated Plan without the consent of the applicable optionee.

 
Key Terms and Conditions of the 2004 Plan

Maximum Option Term

Seven years from date of grant.

Exercise Price

The exercise price of each option granted under the 2004 Plan is determined by the Compensation Committee. The exercise price of each option granted may not be less than the closing price of Barrick Shares on either the TSX or NYSE, as determined by the Committee, on the last trading day before the day the option is granted. Repricing of options is expressly prohibited.

The 2004 Plan permits the granting of options during a Blackout Period at an exercise price equal to the greater of: (a) the market price of Barrick Shares at the time of grant, and (b) the market price of Barrick Shares at the close of trading on the first business day following the expiry of the Blackout Period, provided that in no event shall any options granted during the Blackout Period be exercisable until after the exercise period has been fixed.

“Blackout Period” means a period in which trading of our securities by an option holder is restricted pursuant to: (a) the Company’s written policies (such as the Insider Trading Policy), or (b) a trading blackout imposed on an option holder by the Company.

Vesting and Exercise of Options

Generally, options do not vest immediately. The Committee’s practice has been to grant options having a term of seven years, vesting over a period of four years. The 2004 Plan contains standard provisions permitting accelerated vesting for executive officers and other members of management who are entitled to Change in Control benefits under the Company’s Change in Control Plan.

Transfer and Assignment

Options granted are not assignable, except that in the event of an optionee’s death, options may be exercised in accordance with their terms by appropriate legal representatives.

Expiry of Options

Options may be exercised only for so long as the optionee remains an employee, subject to certain exceptions, including death, termination of employment other than for cause, and retirement.

In the event an option would otherwise expire during or within 10 business days of a Blackout Period, the expiry date of the option is extended to the date that is the tenth business day following the date of expiry of the Blackout Period.

If, before the expiry of an option in accordance with its terms, the employment of the optionee terminates for any reason other than termination by the Company for cause but including termination by reason of the death of the optionee, then the options may be exercised within six months of the date of termination of employment or death of the optionee, but only to the extent that the optionee was entitled to exercise such option at the date of the termination of employment or death of the optionee. However, the Committee may in some cases accelerate the vesting of any unvested options or extend the time in which the optionee, or in the case of the optionee’s death, the optionee’s legal representative, can exercise an option to a date that does not exceed the earlier of the original expiration date of the option and three years from the termination of employment or death of the optionee, as the case may be.

Termination and Amendments

The Board may amend, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2004 Plan and any outstanding option granted under such plan at any time without notice to or approval by the shareholders of the Company (provided that, in the case of any action taken in respect of an outstanding option, the optionee’s consent to such action is required unless the Board determines that the action would not materially and adversely affect such optionee), for any purpose whatsoever, provided that all material amendments to the 2004 Plan shall require the prior approval of the shareholders of the Company. The 2004 Plan sets out a non-exhaustive list of the types of non-material amendments that the Board is entitled to make without shareholder approval.

Performance Measures

Subject to the approval of the Board, the Committee may determine performance measures to be met as a pre-condition to the granting or vesting of an option. These performance measures can be either for the Company as a whole or the optionee. The Compensation Committee may consider one or more of the following performance measures: net income, cash flow, net asset value, production performance, production growth, and reserve growth. Individual performance measures that the Committee may implement under the 2004 Plan will vary according to the individual’s ability to affect business results. However, as noted here, in 2013 the Compensation Committee decided to cease granting stock options as a component of executive compensation. No outstanding options are subject to performance measures.

 
Burn Rate of our Option Plans

The table below sets out the burn rate of the Amended and Restated Plan and the 2004 Plan for the three most recently completed fiscal years. The “burn rate” is defined as the number of options granted in a fiscal year divided by the weighted average number of Barrick Shares outstanding in that year. No options were granted in 2021, 2022, or 2023.

Burn Rates

As at December 31, 2021

As at December 31, 2022

As at December 31, 2023

Amended and Restated Plan

N/A

N/A

N/A

2004 Plan

N/A

N/A

N/A

 
Directors’ and Officers’ Indemnification

Subject to the provisions of the BCBCA, our Articles provide that we will indemnify a current or former director or officer, or another individual who acts or acted at the Company’s request as a director or officer (or equivalent) of another entity against all eligible penalties to which such person is or may be liable, and the Company must indemnify, and pay expenses in advance of the final disposition of an eligible proceeding in accordance with, and to the fullest extent permitted by, the BCBCA. We have also entered into indemnity agreements with directors and officers of the Company in respect of the foregoing. If we become liable under the terms of such indemnity agreements and/or our Articles, our insurance coverage will extend to our liability; however, each claim will be subject to a deductible of $2.5 million or $5 million, depending on the nature of the claim.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Performance Measures

This Circular refers to “EBITDA”, “Adjusted EBITDA”, “Adjusted EBIT”, “Adjusted Net Earnings”, “Adjusted Net Earnings per Share”, “Free Cash Flow”, “Total Cash Costs per ounce”, “C1 Cash Costs”, “All-in Sustaining Costs per ounce”, and “All-in costs per ounce”, each of which is a non-GAAP financial measure without a standard meaning under IFRS. These measures may therefore not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. Set out below is a description of each of these measures and why we use them, together with a reconciliation to the most directly comparable measure under IFRS.

EBIT and Adjusted EBIT

EBIT is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes the following from net earnings:

  • Income tax expense;
  • Finance costs; and
  • Finance income.

Adjusted EBIT is Adjusted EBITDA less depreciation. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Please refer to the next section for a description of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and a table that reconciles these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Attributable EBITDA

EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes the following from net earnings:

  • Income tax expense;
  • Finance costs;
  • Finance income; and
  • Depreciation.

Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a factor or “EBITDA multiple” that is based on an observed or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate total enterprise value of a company.

In addition to adjusted EBITDA, we are also providing attributable EBITDA, which we introduced in the third quarter of 2023 and removes the non-controlling interest portion from our adjusted EBITDA measure. Prior periods have been presented to allow for comparability. Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges; acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation gains/losses; other expense adjustments; and non-controlling interests. We also remove the impact of the income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and depreciation incurred in our equity method accounted investments. Attributable EBITDA further removes the non-controlling interest portion. We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with the adjusting items included in our adjusted net earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense and/or depreciation as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to generate liquidity from our attributable business, including equity method investments, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining business and do not necessarily reflect the underlying operating results for the periods presented. Additionally, it is aligned with how we present our forward-looking guidance on gold ounces and copper pounds produced.

EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and attributable EBITDA are intended to provide additional information to investors and analysts and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and attributable EBITDA exclude the impact of cash costs of financing activities and taxes, and the effects of changes in operating working capital balances, and therefore are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and attributable EBITDA differently.

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Attributable EBITDA

  ($ millions)

For the years ended December 31

 

2023

2022

2021

Net earnings

$1,953

$1,017

$3,288

Income tax expense

861

664

1,344

Finance costs, net1

83

235

307

Depreciation

2,043

1,997

2,102

EBITDA

4,940

3,913

7,041

Impairment charges (reversals) of non-current assets2

312

1,671

(63)

Acquisition/disposition gains3

(364)

(405)

(213)

Loss on currency translation

93

16

29

Other expense (income) adjustments4

96

17

73

Income tax expense, net finance costs1, and depreciation from equity investees

397

401

391

Adjusted EBITDA

5,474

5,613

7,258

Non-controlling interests

(1,487)

(1,584)

(2,011)

Attributable EBITDA

3,987

4,029

5,247

Revenues – as adjusted5

9,411

9,147

9,829

Adjusted EBITDA margin6

42%

44%

53%

  1. Finance costs exclude accretion.
  2. Net impairment charges for the three months and year ended December 31, 2023 mainly relate to a long-lived asset impairment at Long Canyon. For the year ended December 31, 2022, net impairment charges primarily relate to a goodwill impairment at Loulo-Gounkoto, and non-current asset impairments at Veladero and Long Canyon, partially offset by an impairment reversal at Reko Diq.
  3. Acquisition/disposition gains for the three months and year ended December 31, 2023 primarily relate to a gain on the reopening of the Porgera mine as the conditions for the reopening were completed on December 22, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2022, acquisition/disposition gains primarily relate to a gain as Barrick’s interest in the Reko Diq project increased from 37.5% to 50% and the sale of two royalty portfolios.
  4. Other expense (income) adjustments for the three months and year ended December 31, 2023 mainly relate to changes in the discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision and care and maintenance expenses at Porgera. The year ended December 31, 2023 was further impacted by the $30 million commitment we made towards the expansion of education infrastructure in Tanzania, per our community investment obligations under the Twiga partnership. For the year ended December 31, 2022, other expense (income) adjustments mainly relate to a net realizable value impairment of leach pad inventory at Veladero, care and maintenance expenses at Porgera and supplies obsolescence write-off at Bulyanhulu and North Mara.
  5. Refer to Reconciliation of Sales to Realized Price per pound/ounce on page 87 of Barrick’s Q4 MD&A and Financial Statements.
  6. Represents Attributable EBITDA divided by revenues - as adjusted.

Adjusted Net Earnings

“Adjusted net earnings” is a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes the following from net earnings:

  • Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments;
  • Acquisition/disposition gains/losses;
  • Foreign currency translation gains/losses;
  • Significant tax adjustments;
  • Other items that are not indicative of the underlying operating performance of our core mining business; and
  • Tax effect and non-controlling interest of the above items.

Management uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Management believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because impairment charges, acquisition/disposition gains/losses, and significant tax adjustments do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Furthermore, foreign currency translation gains/losses are not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the reporting periods presented. The tax effect and non-controlling interest of the adjusting items are also excluded to reconcile the amounts to Barrick’s share on a post-tax basis, consistent with net earnings.

As noted, we use this measure for internal purposes. Management’s internal budgets and forecasts and public guidance do not reflect the types of items we adjust for. Consequently, the presentation of adjusted net earnings enables investors and analysts to better understand the underlying operating performance of our core mining business through the eyes of management. Management periodically evaluates the components of adjusted net earnings based on an internal assessment of performance measures that are useful for evaluating the operating performance of our business segments and a review of the non-GAAP measures used by mining industry analysts and other mining companies.

Adjusted net earnings is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share

($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars)

For the years ended December 31

 

2023

2022

2021

Net earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company

$1,272

$432

$2,022

Impairment charges (reversals) related to long-lived assets1

312

1,671

(63)

Acquisition/disposition gains2

(364)

(405)

(213)

Loss on currency translation

93

16

29

Significant tax adjustments3

220

95

125

Other expense adjustments4

96

17

73

Non-controlling interest5

(98)

(274)

64

Tax effect5

(64)

(226)

28

Adjusted net earnings

$1,467

$1,326

$2,065

Net earnings per share6

0.72

0.24

1.14

Adjusted net earnings per share6

0.84

0.75

1.16

  1. Net impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2023 mainly relate to a long-lived asset impairment at Long Canyon. For the year ended December 31 2022, net impairment charges primarily relate to a goodwill impairment at Loulo-Gounkoto, and non-current asset impairments at Veladero and Long Canyon, partially offset by an impairment reversal at Reko Diq.
  2. Acquisition/disposition gains for the year ended December 31, 2023 primarily relate to a gain on the reopening of the Porgera mine as the conditions for the reopening were completed on December 22, 2023. For the year ended December 31, 2022, acquisition/disposition gains primarily relate to a gain as Barrick’s interest in the Reko Diq project increased from 37.5% to 50% and the sale of two royalty portfolios.
  3. Significant tax adjustments in 2023 primarily relate to deferred tax recoveries as a result of impairment charges; foreign currency translation gains and losses on tax balances; the resolution of uncertain tax positions; the impact of prior year adjustments; the impact of nondeductible foreign exchange losses; and the recognition and derecognition of deferred tax assets. In 2022, significant tax adjustments primarily relate to deferred tax recoveries as a result of net impairment charges; foreign currency translation gains and losses on tax balances; the Porgera mine continuing to be on care and maintenance; updates to the rehabilitation provision for our non-operating mines; and the recognition and de-recognition of deferred tax assets.
  4. Other expense adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2023 mainly relate to changes in discount rate assumptions on our closed mine rehabilitation provision, care and maintenance expenses at Porgera, and the $30 million commitment we made towards the expansion of education infrastructure in Tanzania, per our community investment obligations under the Twiga partnership. For the year ended December 31, 2022, other expense adjustments mainly relate to a net realizable value impairment of leach pad inventory at Veladero, care and maintenance expenses at Porgera and supplies obsolescence write-off at Bulyanhulu and North Mara.
  5. Non-controlling interest and tax effect for the current year primarily relates to impairment charges (reversals) related to non-current assets.
  6. Calculated using weighted average number of shares outstanding under the basic method of earnings per share.

Free Cash Flow

Free cash flow is a non-GAAP financial measure that deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. Management believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash.

Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. The measure is not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. The following table reconciles this non-GAAP measure to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.

Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow

($ millions)

For the years ended December 31

 

2023

2022

2021

Net cash provided by operating activities

$3,732

$3,481

$4,378

Capital expenditures

(3,086)

(3,049)

(2,435)

Free cash flow

$646

$432

$1,943

Total cash costs per ounce, All-in sustaining costs per ounce, and All-in costs per ounce

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce are non-GAAP financial measures which are calculated based on the definition published by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick) (WGC). The WGC is not a regulatory organization. Management uses these measures to monitor the performance of our gold mining operations and its ability to generate positive cash flow, both on an individual site basis and an overall company basis.

Total cash costs start with our cost of sales related to gold production and removes depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales and includes by-product credits. All-in sustaining costs start with total cash costs and includes minesite sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. These additional costs reflect the expenditures made to maintain current production levels.

All-in costs starts with all-in sustaining costs and adds additional costs that reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine, including: project capital expenditures (capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net present value through higher production or longer mine life) and other non-sustaining costs (primarily non-sustaining leases, exploration and evaluation costs, community relations costs and general and administrative costs that are not associated with current operations). These definitions recognize that there are different costs associated with the life-cycle of a mine, and that it is therefore appropriate to distinguish between sustaining and non-sustaining costs.

We believe that our use of total cash costs, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall company basis. Due to the capital-intensive nature of the industry and the long useful lives over which these items are depreciated, there can be a significant timing difference between net earnings calculated in accordance with IFRS and the amount of free cash flow that is being generated by a mine and therefore we believe these measures are useful non-GAAP operating metrics and supplement our IFRS disclosures. These measures are not representative of all of our cash expenditures as they do not include income tax payments, interest costs or dividend payments. These measures do not include depreciation or amortization.

Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs and all-in costs are intended to provide additional information only and do not have standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. These measures are not equivalent to net income or cash flow from operations as determined under IFRS. Although the WGC has published a standardized definition, other companies may calculate these measures differently.

In addition to presenting these metrics on a by-product basis, we have calculated these metrics on a co-product basis. Our co-product metrics remove the impact of other metal sales that are produced as a by-product of our gold production from cost per ounce calculations but do not reflect a reduction in costs for costs associated with other metal sales.

Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis

  ($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars)

For the years ended December 31

 

2023

2022

2021

Cost of sales applicable to gold production

7,178

$6,813

$6,504

Depreciation

(1,756)

(1,756)

(1,889)

Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments

260

222

217

By-product credits

(252)

(225)

(285)

Non-recurring items1

0

(23)

0

Other2

18

(23)

(48)

Non-controlling interests3

(1,578)

(1,442)

(1,261)

Total cash costs

3,870

$3,566

$3,238

General & administrative costs

29

$151

$151

Minesite exploration and evaluation costs4

4

75

64

Minesite sustaining capital expenditures5

569

2,071

1,673

Sustaining leases

7

38

41

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)6

20

50

50

Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other7

(230)

(900)

(636)

All-in sustaining costs

1,429

$5,059

$4,581

Global exploration and evaluation and project costs4

99

$275

$223

Community relations costs not related to current operations

1

0

0

Project capital expenditures5

278

949

747

Non-sustaining leases

0

0

0

Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (non-operating sites)6

7

19

13

Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other7

(112)

(327)

(240)

All-in costs

1,702

$5,975

$5,324

Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces)8

1,042

4,141

4,468

Cost of sales per ounce9,10

1,359

$1,241

$1,093

Total cash costs per ounce10

982

$862

$725

Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)10,11

1,026

897

765

All-in sustaining costs per ounce10

1,364

$1,222

$1,026

All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)10,11

1,408

1,257

1,066

All-in costs per ounce10

1,627

$1,443

$1,192

All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis)10,11

1,671

1,478

1,232

  1. Non-recurring items.
    These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs. Non-recurring items for the year ended December 31, 2022 relate to a net realizable value impairment of leach pad inventory at Veladero.
  2. Other
    Other adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2023 include the removal of total cash costs and by-product credits associated with assets which are producing incidental ounces of $3 million (2022: $24 million; 2021: $51 million). This includes Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021 and Buzwagi starting in the fourth quarter of 2021.
  3. Non-controlling interests
    Non-controlling interests include non-controlling interests related to gold production of $2,192 million, for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $2,032 million; 2021: $1,923 million). Non-controlling interests include Nevada Gold Mines, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi up until the third quarter of 2021. Refer to note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information.
  4. Exploration and evaluation costs
    Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects.
  5. Capital expenditures
    Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net present value through higher production or longer mine life. Significant projects in 2023 were the expansion project at Pueblo Viejo and the solar projects at Nevada Gold Mines and Loulo-Gounkoto.
  6. Rehabilitation – accretion and amortization
    Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites.
  7. Non-controlling interest and copper operations
    Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the non-controlling interests of Nevada Gold Mines, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu and Buzwagi (up until the third quarter of 2021) operating segments. It also includes capital expenditures applicable to our equity method investment in Kibali. Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021 and Buzwagi starting in the fourth quarter of 2021. The impact is summarized as the following:

    ($ millions)

    For the years ended

     

    Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other

    2023

    2022

    2021

     

    General & administrative costs

     

    $(9)

     

    $(31)

     

    $(21)

     

    Minesite exploration and evaluation costs

     

    (14)

     

    (27)

     

    (19)

     

    Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites)

     

    (21)

     

    (16)

     

    (14)

     

    Minesite sustaining capital expenditures

     

    (780)

     

    (826)

     

    (582)

     

    All-in sustaining costs total

     

    (824)

     

    $(900)

     

    $(636)

     

    Global exploration and evaluation and project costs

     

    (118)

     

    $(32)

     

    $(19)

     

    Project capital expenditures

     

    (305)

     

    (295)

     

    (221)

     

    All-in costs total

     

    (423)

     

    $(327)

     

    $(240)

     

  8. Ounces sold – equity basis
    Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021, and Buzwagi starting in the fourth quarter of 2021. Some of these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.
  9. Cost of sales per ounce
    Figures remove the cost of sales impact of Pierina of $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $24 million; 2021: $20 million); Golden Sunlight of $nil for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $nil; 2021: $nil); up until its divestiture in June 2021, Lagunas Norte of $nil for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $nil million; 2021: $37 million); and starting in the fourth quarter of 2021, Buzwagi of $nil for the year ended December 31, 2023 (2022: $nil; 2021: $nil), which are producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).
  10. Per ounce figures
    Cost of sales per ounce, cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding.
  11. Co-product costs per ounce
    Cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce, and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis remove the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as:

    ($ millions)

    For the years ended

      

    2023

    2022

    2021

    By-product credits

    252

    $225

    $285

    Non-controlling interest

    (81)

    (78)

    (108)

    By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest)

    171

    $147

    $177

Technical Information

The scientific and technical information in this Circular has been reviewed and approved by Simon Bottoms, Cgeol, MGeol, FGS, FAusIMM, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive, a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.

All mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Unless otherwise noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are as of December 31, 2023. Complete mineral reserve and mineral resource data for all mines and projects referenced in this Circular, including tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found in the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Tables included in pages 97 to 104 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial statements filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

Gold Equivalent Ounces

Gold equivalent ounces calculated from our copper assets are calculated using a long term mineral reserve commodity prices of $1,300/oz gold and $3.00/lb copper.

Reserve Replacement

Reserve Replacement measures attributable reserve gains in gold equivalent ounces calculated from the cumulative net change in attributable reserves in gold equivalent ounces(a) from the most recently completed year and the trailing two years (excluding any attributable acquisitions or divestments). 

Reserve Replacement percentage is calculated from the cumulative net change in attributable reserves in gold equivalent ounces(a) from the most recently completed year and the trailing two years divided by the cumulative depletion in attributable reserves in gold equivalent ounces from the most recently completed year and the trailing two years as set forth in the table below (excluding attributable acquisitions and divestments):(b)

Year

Attributable P&P Gold Equivalent
Ounce(a) Depletion (Moz)

Attributable P&P Gold Equivalent
Ounce(a) Net Change (Moz)

2021(c)

(6.85)

8.46

2022(d)

(6.25)

12.98

2023(e)

(5.95)

6.67

2021 – 2023 Total

(19.05)

28.11

  1. Gold equivalent ounces from Barrick’s copper assets are calculated using a long term mineral reserve commodity prices of $1,300 per ounce of gold and $3.00 per pound of copper. For further details, see “Gold Equivalent Ounces”.
  2. Complete mineral reserve and mineral resource data for all mines and projects referenced in this Circular, including tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found in the Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources Tables included in pages 97 to 104 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s fourth quarter and full year 2023 financial statements filed on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
  3. As of December 31, 2021, proven mineral reserves of 240 million tonnes grading 2.20g/t, representing 17 million ounces of gold and 380 million tonnes grading 0.41%, representing 3,400 million pounds of copper (which is equal to 1.6 million tonnes of copper), and probable reserves of 1,000 million tonnes grading 1.60g/t, representing 53 million ounces of gold and 1,100 million tonnes grading 0.37%, representing 8,800 million pounds of copper (which is equal to 4.0 million tonnes of copper). Conversions may not recalculate due to rounding.
  4. As of December 31, 2022, proven mineral reserves of 260 million tonnes grading 2.26g/t, representing 19 million ounces of gold and 390 million tonnes grading 0.40%, representing 3,500 million pounds of copper (which is equal to 1.6 million tonnes of copper), and probable reserves of 1,200 million tonnes grading 1.53g/t, representing 57 million ounces of gold and 1,100 million tonnes grading 0.37%, representing 8,800 million pounds of copper (which is equal to 4.0 million tonnes of copper). Conversions may not recalculate due to rounding.
  5. As of December 31, 2023, proven mineral reserves of 250 million tonnes grading 1.85g/t, representing 15 million ounces of gold, and 320 million tonnes grading 0.41%, representing 1.3 million tonnes of copper. Probable reserves of 1,200 million tonnes grading 1.61g/t, representing 61 million ounces of gold, and 1,100 million tonnes grading 0.38%, representing 4.3 million tonnes of copper. Conversions may not recalculate due to rounding.

 

Schedule A: Corporate Governance Disclosure

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURE

We aim to be the world’s most valued gold and copper mining business by finding, developing and owning the best assets, with the best people, to deliver sustainable returns for our owners and partners. By treating our external partners’ interests as our own, we become the preferred partner of host governments and communities, the most sought-after employer among the world’s best talent, and the natural choice for the most thoughtful long-term investors. A partnership culture is Barrick’s most authentic, distinctive, and sustainable competitive advantage.

We have also made a partnership culture central to our distinctive structure for governance and management, one that is best suited to this moment in Barrick’s history.

In the section entitled “Our Governance and Leadership Structure” below, we explain in detail how our structure works and delineate clearly and specifically the responsibilities of our Board, our Chairman, our Lead Director, and our President and Chief Executive Officer.

The Board regularly and carefully reviews and enhances our corporate governance policies and practices. Our corporate governance policies and practices are consistent with the Canadian Securities Administrators’ National Policy 58-201 – Corporate Governance Guidelines, and they also take into account rules of the TSX (TSX Rules) and the NYSE (NYSE Standards), even though most of the NYSE Standards do not directly apply to us as a Canadian company. We have summarized below the significant difference between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE Standards which are applicable to U.S. companies:

  • Section 303A.08 of the NYSE Standards requires shareholder approval of all “equity compensation plans” and material revisions. The definition of equity compensation plans under the NYSE Standards covers plans that provide for the delivery of newly issued securities, as well as plans that rely on securities reacquired on the market by the issuing company for the purpose of redistribution to employees and directors. In comparison, the TSX Rules require shareholder approval of security-based compensation arrangements only in respect of arrangements which involve the delivery of newly issued securities or specified amendments thereto. Therefore, Barrick does not seek shareholder approval for equity compensation plans and amendments unless they involve newly issued securities or constitute specified amendments under the TSX Rules.

Barrick’s corporate governance framework includes the mandates and key practices of the Board and its committees, position descriptions for our Chairman, Lead Director, and President and Chief Executive Officer, as well as a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance. Additional governance information is available on Barrick’s website, including our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our Disclosure Policy. Detailed information on the committees of the Board (Audit & Risk, Compensation, and ESG & Nominating) can be found under the headingCommittees of the Board.

Board Mandate and Responsibilities

Our Board serves as the voice of all owners by setting the Company’s policies and priorities in keeping with its purpose and values, and ensuring that management carries out those priorities to the highest possible standard. The Board has adopted a formal mandate which describes its major responsibilities, goals, and duties. The Board is satisfied that it is not constrained in its access to information, in its deliberations, or in its ability to satisfy its legal mandate to supervise the business and affairs of the Company, and that there are sufficient systems and procedures in place to enable the Board to function independently of management. In performing its role, our Board makes major policy decisions, participates in strategic planning, delegates to management the authority and responsibility for day-to-day affairs, and reviews management’s performance and effectiveness. The full text of the Board’s mandate, which is reviewed annually by the Board, is set out in Schedule B of this Circular.

The Board’s primary supervisory responsibilities are described below.

Strategic Planning

One of the Board’s major responsibilities is to review, with management, our strategic goals and objectives. Throughout the year, the Board reviews the Company’s operating plans and budgets, which take into account the opportunities and principal risks of our business. The Board is provided with regular updates on the implementation of our strategies, plans and budgets, sustainability strategy, climate change strategy, focus on Tier One Gold Assets and Tier One Copper Assets which meet our investment criteria, non-core asset disposition strategy, dividend strategy, succession planning, and initiatives to increase Board and senior leadership diversity. The Board is also provided with regular updates on any regulatory, environmental, or social constraints that may impact the achievement of the Company’s business objectives.

Risk Oversight

The Board believes that an enterprise-wide approach to risk management allows the Company to assess and mitigate risks most efficiently and effectively. The Board therefore expects management to:

  • maintain a framework that ensures we identify, manage and mitigate risk effectively and in a manner that creates the greatest value;
  • integrate procedures for identifying, managing, and mitigating risk into all of our important decision-making processes so that we reduce the effect of uncertainty on achieving our objectives;
  • ensure that the key controls we rely on to achieve the Company’s objectives are actively monitored so that they remain effective; and
  • provide assurance to the executives and relevant Committees of the Board on the effectiveness of key control activities.

Our distinctive and authentic partnership model reflects our belief that complex matters are better understood and managed by a team of partners working together, especially in assessing and reducing risk. Our lean, decentralized model has led to more collaboration, better decision making, and faster communication and problem solving. By further decentralizing our corporate office, we have accelerated the pace at which information flows between leadership and our mines. This nimble structure enhances our risk management processes by ensuring instant information sharing and greater transparency.

The Board oversees the Company’s enterprise risk and internal control frameworks principally through the Audit & Risk Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors. The Audit & Risk Committee also oversees the design and execution of Barrick’s financial risk management programs. Through this committee, the Board also oversees risk management of major financial risks and financial reporting exposures, as they relate to internal control over financial reporting. The Audit & Risk Committee also provides oversight over the Business Assurance function, which is responsible for providing assurance over the effective design and operation of internal controls related to key risk areas. Through the Compensation Committee, also composed entirely of independent directors, the Board oversees the alignment of Barrick’s executive compensation programs with strategic priorities, including programs implemented to manage risks related to compensation practices and mitigate undue risk-taking. Through the ESG & Nominating Committee, also composed entirely of independent directors, the Board oversees the development of risk management programs relating to Barrick’s environmental, health and safety, corporate social responsibility, security, and human rights exposures. The ESG & Nominating Committee is also responsible for liaising with the Audit & Risk Committee on risks relating to ESG matters.

The Weekly Executive Review, which is held among the President and Chief Executive Officer, Senior Executive Vice-President, Strategic Matters, Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer, other key executives including our regional Chief Operating Officers, and other senior management, is the main forum to raise and discuss risks facing our operations and organization more broadly. At quarterly meetings, the Board and the Audit & Risk Committee are provided with updates on issues identified by management at these weekly sessions.

During 2023, we continued to provide the Audit & Risk Committee with concise and relevant risk information to facilitate its oversight of key risks facing the Company and how they are being managed, including new, emerging, and long-term risks that may have a material impact on the Company’s business model and long-term prospects. In-depth briefings were delivered on specific topics to provide a more detailed understanding of risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies, where appropriate. For example, during 2023, in-depth briefings were provided to the Audit & Risk Committee on a range of topics, including key operational and geopolitical risks and mitigation strategies across the Company’s portfolio, including regular updates on global inflationary pressures and Barrick’s strategies to mitigate the impact of higher energy costs and supply chain disruptions on our operations; political and economic uncertainty in Argentina related to local inflationary pressures and strict currency controls; security risks in certain of the locations where the Company does business, such as the DRC and Mali; the potential impacts of infectious diseases, such as Ebola and Malaria; potential risks and opportunities related to the reconstitution and future development of the Reko Diq project; tailings facility management; Barrick’s tax strategy and key legacy and emerging tax risks across Barrick’s portfolio of assets; Barrick’s engagement with its host countries to secure our license to operate, including the implementation of the framework agreement for the planned reopening of the Porgera mine in Papua New Guinea and the commencement agreement with the Government of Tanzania resulting in the full and final settlement of legacy tax disputes associated with Tanzanian assets acquired by Barrick from Acacia Mining plc in 2019; climate disclosures aligned with the recommendations of the TCFD as well as updates on new climate disclosure proposals issued by Canadian and U.S. securities regulators and the International Sustainability Standards Board.

In addition, the Audit & Risk Committee received an in-depth briefing in 2023 from the Vice-President, Group Information Technology on cybersecurity strategy, including with respect to ongoing improvements to Barrick’s cybersecurity capabilities and enhancements to end-user security as well as training initiatives and penetration testing. The Audit & Risk Committee also received updates on Barrick’s cybersecurity strategy and cyber-related risks from the Senior Vice-President, Business Assurance, Risk and Business Integrity at every meeting. The Audit & Risk Committee was also updated on Barrick’s financial plan and the performance dividend policy and share buyback program.

In August 2023, seven of the eight independent directors standing for election at the Meeting completed a site visit to the Pueblo Viejo Mine in the Dominican Republic to monitor operational progress and evaluate key issues and risks, including the expansion project and the proposed new tailings facility.  

The diagram below summarizes our enterprise-wide approach to risk oversight and the allocation of risk oversight responsibilities.

Barrick has an enterprise-wide approach to risk oversight. Risk oversight responsibilities are allocated to the committees of the Board, including the Audit & Risk Committee, the Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee, and the Compensation Committee. All committees are fully independent. Risks are further overseen by management, including through the weekly executive review meetings, the Environmental & Social Oversight Committee, the Business Assurance group, and the Risk Group.

Integrity of Internal Controls

The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s internal control environment. The Board exercises oversight of assurance activities designed to provide comfort on the effectiveness of internal controls principally through the Audit & Risk Committee. The Audit & Risk Committee regularly reviews reports from the head of the Company’s risk management and assurance group, as well as from our independent auditor, to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, and other controls considered critical to the management of enterprise-level risks, including cybersecurity risks.

Through the Audit & Risk Committee, the Board oversees assurance relating to accounting and financial reporting and external disclosure. The Audit & Risk Committee also reviews and recommends approval of our consolidated financial statements and other external reporting and audit requirements. At each of its meetings, the Audit & Risk Committee meets with the external auditor and the head of Barrick’s Business Assurance function as part of its regular in camera session. Through the ESG & Nominating Committee, the Board oversees assurance relating to our environmental, health and safety, corporate social responsibility, security, and human rights performance.

Our Sustainability Vision, Mission, and Guiding Principles

Our corporate vision sets out what sustainability means at Barrick and is rooted in the belief that to operate successfully, we must deliver long-term value to all of our stakeholders and manage our impacts on the wider environment. Focusing on sustainability has long been of critical importance to Barrick and is entrenched in our Company DNA. Our commitments to respecting human rights, protecting the health and safety of our people and local communities, sharing the benefits of our operations, and managing our impact on the environment are core business priorities, and are embedded in our decision-making processes and every facet of our operations. Investors are encouraged to review our Sustainability Report to see how we work toward making a positive difference in the lives of employees, stakeholders, business partners, and host communities around the world.

Human Capital Management and Succession Planning

Our people are the driving force behind our track record of achievements. We strive to be a global employer of choice that attracts and retains the best people to run our portfolio of best-in-class assets and who share our vision and values to become the world’s most valued gold and copper mining business. We engage employees and contractors across the globe and empower them to work in safer, more creative, and more rewarding ways every day. We are committed to advancing and promoting a diverse and inclusive culture across our business that inspires and supports the growth of our employees, serves our communities, and shapes a more sustainable business. Our human capital strategy is actively overseen by the Board and the Executive Committee throughout the year.

We benefit from having director nominees with experience and expertise in talent development and allocation. The Board is regularly updated on the Company’s talent pipeline and human capital strategy, the effectiveness of which is assessed annually as part of the Strategic Execution measure of the Company Long-Term Incentive Scorecard (which accounts for up to 15% of LTI awards for our Partners) and tracked as part of our annual sustainability reporting. Talent is also a core topic at Weekly Executive Reviews.

Our human capital strategy, including our approach to advancing and promoting diversity, continues to be a critical enabler of positive change and impact. Our focus areas are summarized below.

Leadership and Talent Development

We approach leadership and talent development with the same rigor and discipline that we apply to our business strategy. Our approach is anchored in developing and promoting the right internal talent and hiring the right external talent, with an emphasis on local recruitment, for career opportunities across our global organization.

We invest in our people through world-class training and development programs that are country-based and tailored to local needs, covering technical, behavioral, and informal learning to help our people feel engaged, valued, and empowered. This, in turn, helps us deliver on our strategic priorities across our regions and sites. We provide focused and accelerated career progression support, including meaningful stretch assignments, shadowing and mentorship opportunities, as well as global placement opportunities to foster a culture of continuous learning. We engage in detailed discussions around talent development and succession planning at all levels of our organization and provide constructive and regular feedback. We also maintain a comprehensive global database of employee skills and development plans.

Our approach to leadership and talent development training is summarized below.

Barrick's approach to talent development includes three main pillars: technical and behavioural training; financial and commercial acumen training; executive and management development programs.

Succession Planning

The Board believes that talent management and succession planning are critical to Barrick’s continued success. The Board reviews senior leadership succession, including for the President and Chief Executive Officer. The succession plans are based on Barrick’s talent management systems that identify candidates who have the skills, experience, and leadership needed for progression to a senior leadership role. A talent assessment process is used throughout the organization to review the capabilities and potential of our current and emerging leaders and to assist with development and succession planning. The Company also has in place an emergency succession plan to deal with any situation that requires the immediate replacement of the President and Chief Executive Officer.

At each regularly scheduled Board meeting, the Board receives a Human Resources Report covering succession planning, recruitment, development considerations, and retention of senior leaders and individuals who have been identified as high-potential executives. This ensures that the Board is kept apprised of our pipeline of talent at all levels of the business. We conduct annual talent assessment reviews, which involve reviewing individual profiles, identifying current, short-term and long-term readiness levels, building individual development plans, and creating succession slates to ensure that our business has the right skills in the right roles to deliver on our objectives. In addition, Barrick focuses on ensuring the development of its high-potential Partners and people through development moves to other positions, on-the-job mentoring and training, and internal and external courses.

To improve the Board’s understanding of the Company’s culture and talent pipeline, the Board is introduced to high-potential individuals in the Company. The Board also meets regularly with our senior Partners through their participation in Board and Committee meetings and continuing education sessions. Our senior Partners also participate in informal meetings with members of the Board throughout the year. This regular interaction with the Board ensures that directors get to know the individuals who have been identified as potential future leaders of the Company.

Diversity and Inclusion

Diversity and inclusion are essential for a modern mining business and play a critical role as part of our mission to transform natural resources into sustainable benefits and mutual prosperity for our employees, local communities, and host country governments. As an equal opportunity employer, our policy is to appoint the best person to the job based on individual strengths, irrespective of gender, race, disability, ethnicity, religious belief, or sexual orientation. We have made significant investments to build an effective multicultural and multigenerational workforce that is equipped to take on the challenges of a changing world through a number of initiatives to attract the best people from a variety of backgrounds. Our strategy to achieve a more diverse and engaged workplace continues with our enduring focus in the following areas: 

  • Living our sustainability strategy by prioritizing local hiring to grow the cultural and ethnic diversity of our workforce. We also build the skills and capabilities of our host country workers to multiply our positive impact on local, regional, and national economies. As of December 31, 2023, 97% of our employees are local nationals, and our multicultural workforce reflects our commitment.
  • Doing our part to right the gender imbalance in the historically male-dominated mining industry by prioritizing initiatives that support gender diversity, including the recruitment and development of women at all levels in our workforce, from internship to management.
  • Continuing our focus on recruiting and training the next generation of mining talent with the potential to become future leaders of the Company.
  • Fostering an inclusive environment where our employees feel that all voices are heard, all cultures and differences respected, and that a variety of perspectives are welcome and essential to our long-term success.

Our flat, decentralized management structure engenders our inclusive culture and provides our executive team with direct access to our operations and enables transparent, two-way communication. We also conduct annual executive and regional team effectiveness sessions to create a shared understanding of, and commitment to, Barrick’s high performance ethos. Since the Merger, the President and Chief Executive Officer and a core group of our executives spend approximately five full weeks per quarter engaged in the quarterly business reviews with regional and site leadership teams prior to each Board meeting. For the remainder of each quarter, the President and Chief Executive Officer and a majority of our executives are physically present in our operating regions embedding the Barrick DNA, driving key initiatives, and assessing organizational capability. During these site visits, we engage in rigorous discussions focused on business execution, safety and environmental performance, and the status of key projects; solicit direct employee feedback; and provide management with an important opportunity to interface with emerging high potential talent.

Local Workforce and Gender Diversity

Our sustainable development contribution is not only financial, nor is it only about the here and now. We train the next generation of in-country industry leaders, prioritize local recruitment, and foster local entrepreneurialism. In 2023, 97% of our workforce, including 77% of site leadership teams, were host country nationals, and we contributed approximately $6.9 billion to the purchase of goods and services from in-country businesses. Significant efforts were also made to advance the recruitment, training, and development of female talent at all levels in our workforce, from internship to management, as we continue to do our part to right the gender imbalance in the historically male-dominated mining industry. In 2023, 19% of all new hires were female and we continued to actively promote gender diversity across the organization, including the provision of career workshops and targeted leadership development initiatives to foster greater diversity at our operations and local communities. Beyond this, we also continued to work with local governments to remove barriers to employment for women and we partnered with local communities to change cultural norms and raise awareness about the importance and value of employment and economic empowerment for local women.

Diversity Initiatives

Diversity Policy

In 2015, consistent with our commitment to diversity on the Board and in senior leadership positions, Barrick adopted a written Diversity Policy. In February 2021, following the ESG & Nominating Committee’s annual review of the Diversity Policy and recommendation to the Board, the Board approved amendments to the Diversity Policy to include a target for women to represent at least 30% of directors by the end of 2022. In furtherance of our commitment to diversity and our steadfast belief that diverse perspectives enhance organizational strength, problem solving ability, and opportunity for innovation, in February 2023, the ESG & Nominating Committee recommended the disclosure of the number and proportion of directors who self-identify as racially and/or ethnically diverse. If all director nominees are elected at the Meeting, women will represent 40% of all Barrick’s directors and 50% of our independent directors. Our slate of 10 director nominees for election at the Meeting was carefully constructed to ensure that our director nominees represent key business geographies and is comprised of individuals whose backgrounds reflect the diversity of our stakeholders. This results in a slate of nominees of which 40% will self-identify as racially and/or ethnically diverse. Each director nominee contributes to the Board’s overall diversity by providing, among other characteristics, a diversity of thought, perspective, personal and professional experience, and cultural background.

In considering directors for nomination to the Board, the Diversity Policy requires the Board and the ESG & Nominating Committee to consider diversity criteria, such as gender, age, ethnicity, disability, diversity of thought, and geographical background. In addition, the Diversity Policy requires the ESG & Nominating Committee to consider and recommend, where appropriate, the implementation of initiatives to promote gender diversity at the Board and senior leadership levels. In particular, the Diversity Policy requires the ESG & Nominating Committee, when identifying and considering the selection of candidates for election or re-election to the Board, to consider the level of representation of women on the Board. In furtherance of the target set forth in the Diversity Policy, the ESG & Nominating Committee will strive to maintain a Board in which women represent at least 30% of directors. As appropriate, Barrick retains an external search firm to identify potential candidates who meet the Board’s expertise, skills, and diversity criteria and to help Barrick achieve its diversity objectives.

Similarly, at the senior leadership level, the Diversity Policy requires the Board, the Chairman, and the President and Chief Executive Officer to consider diversity criteria, including gender, age, ethnicity, disability, diversity of thought, and geographical background, as well as the level of representation of women in senior leadership positions in making senior leadership appointments. The Diversity Policy does not, however, establish any mandatory quotas regarding the representation of women in senior leadership, including executive officer positions, because the Board does not believe that mandatory quotas necessarily result in the identification or selection of the best candidates for Barrick’s highly specialized business.

Every year, the ESG & Nominating Committee reviews the Diversity Policy and assesses the Company’s progress against its objectives. This review enables the ESG & Nominating Committee, on an ongoing basis, to assess the effectiveness of the Diversity Policy. The results of the ESG & Nominating Committee’s assessment are set out below under the heading “Diversity Policy Assessment”.

Board Diversity

Barrick has nominated ten directors for election at the Meeting, including four female directors with diverse backgrounds who, if elected, will represent 40% of our Board and 50% of independent directors. Assuming all ten nominees are elected, our Board will include a combination of international business leaders and mining industry professionals with expertise and experience working in all the jurisdictions in which Barrick now operates and possessing the skills, professional experience, and backgrounds necessary to best address the opportunities, challenges, and risks of our business.

As part of the identification and selection process for potential candidates for the Board, the ESG & Nominating Committee is mindful of the benefit of diversity on the Board and the need to maximize the effectiveness of the Board and its decision-making abilities. Gender diversity is one element of diversity that the Board considers important. The ESG & Nominating Committee also considers several other aspects of diversity within the context of the Company’s needs and objectives and its domestic and international operations, including each candidate’s background and experience, expertise, geographical representation, ethnicity, cultural background, disability, and age, as well as gender. The current Board members range in age from 50 to 77 years and have experience conducting business and operating in the very geographic regions where Barrick operates. In addition, our Board nominees possess a range of expertise and knowledge garnered through experiences in a broad range of industries, including mining, finance, law, infrastructure, media, government, oil and gas, manufacturing, and technology. Accordingly, in searches for new directors, the ESG & Nominating Committee considers the level of female representation on the Board, along with ways in which diversity can be increased in other areas.

Senior Leadership Diversity

In addition to Board diversity, Barrick understands the benefits of a diversified workforce. While Barrick does not have a fixed target for the representation of women in executive officer positions, under its Diversity Policy, Barrick is committed to promoting diversity (including gender diversity) among its senior leadership and will consider the level of female representation and the other indicia of diversity, outlined above, when deliberating on hires and promotions regarding all senior leadership positions, including executive officers.

In identifying and considering potential candidates for senior leadership, including executive officer appointments, the Board considers factors such as years of service, regional background, merit, experience, and qualifications. In addition, unlike the identification and selection process for the Board, the diversity of the Company’s senior leadership is driven by other factors, some of which are outside of the control of the Company, including the level of senior leadership turnover, the times at which hiring and promotion opportunities arise, and the available leadership pipeline.

As of March 20, 2024, there are five women in senior vice-president and vice-president roles at Barrick, comprising 14% of the Company’s vice-president group, and three of the Company’s executive officers are women (19%). Women comprise 14% of our Partners.

Diversity Policy Assessment

The ESG & Nominating Committee conducted an assessment of the Diversity Policy, including our progress against the amendments approved by the Board in 2021 to include a target for women to represent at least 30% of directors by the end of 2022, by comparing the diversity characteristics and profiles of the Board and executive team as of February 2024 relative to February 2023. The profile of the Board continues to represent a broad range of geographies, age groups, education, and experience. If all director nominees are elected at the Meeting, women will represent 40% of all Barrick’s directors and 50% of our independent directors, satisfying the 30% target set forth in the Diversity Policy.

The Company’s Human Resources function ensures that diverse candidates are considered for all executive roles and that when independent advisors are retained, they are instructed to present a diverse list of candidates. In accordance with this policy, Barrick appointed Ms. Christine Keener as Chief Operating Officer of Barrick’s North America region in February 2022 and Ms. Poupak Bahamin as General Counsel of the Company in April 2022. Reflecting these appointments, as of March 20, 2024, the percentage of female executive officers is 19% (i.e., 3 of 16).

The representation of women on our Board and in executive officer, Partner, and senior vice-president and vice-president positions for the last three years is as follows:

Category

March 24, 2022

March 23, 2023

March 20, 2024

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Number

Percentage

Board of Directors

3 of 11

27%

4 of 12

33%

4 of 11(1)

36%(1)

Executive Officers  

3 of 16

19%

3 of 16

19%

3 of 16

19%

Partners

6 of 40

15%

5 of 38

13%

5 of 37

14%

Senior Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents (excluding Executive Officers)

3 of 21

14%

2 of 20

10%

2 of 21

10%

Senior Vice-Presidents and Vice-Presidents (including Executive Officers)

6 of 37

16%

5 of 36

14%

5 of 37

14%

  1. Mr. Michael Evans will be retiring from the Board effective April 30, 2024. Following his retirement, if all of our 10 directors are elected at the Meeting, women will comprise four of our 10 directors (40%).

While our commitments to diversity have yielded year-over-year improvements in the representation of women on the Board, we recognize that we still have work to do in order to achieve our diversity priorities and to do our part to right the gender imbalance in the historically male-dominated mining industry.

Evaluating Our President and Chief Executive Officer and Other Senior Officers

The Board has approved position descriptions and Committee mandates, and has established a management evaluation process.

The Chairman conducts an annual performance evaluation of the President and Chief Executive Officer with input from the Lead Director and reports to the Board and the Compensation Committee, as appropriate, regarding such evaluation. The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board the annual compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer. The compensation of the President and Chief Executive Officer is approved by our independent directors. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the annual compensation of the other senior officers based on the annual performance evaluation of such officers and the compensation recommendations provided by the President and Chief Executive Officer. The Compensation Committee bases its recommendations and approvals on Barrick’s established policies regarding the performance of each individual executive as measured against the API Scorecard disclosed to shareholders in advance and on the performance of the Company as measured against the Long-Term Company Scorecard disclosed to shareholders in advance. Executive compensation is considered in the context of the overall stewardship and governance of the Company. A more detailed description of the criteria and methodology used to assess performance and determine the compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and other senior officers is set out here.

Communications and Shareholder Engagement

We have a Disclosure Policy that enshrines our commitment to providing timely, factual, and accurate disclosure of material information about the Company to our shareholders, the financial community, and the public. The Company has adopted disclosure practices that ensure material information is not disclosed to investors, analysts, or others selectively in contravention of applicable securities laws. Any communications or meetings with our shareholders or others will comply with those disclosure practices. The Board reviews and approves the contents of major disclosure documents, including our Annual Report, quarterly reports to shareholders, Annual Information Form, and Circular. A copy of our Disclosure Policy is available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

Communications regarding our business and operations, financial results, and strategy are provided by senior management periodically throughout the year in many ways, including our annual and quarterly reports, Annual Information Form, Sustainability Report, news releases, and through industry and investor conferences and meetings with analysts and investors. Management also hosts conference calls and webcasts for quarterly earnings releases and major corporate developments as soon as practical after they are publicly announced. These disclosure documents, investor presentations, conference calls, and webcasts are available through our website at www.barrick.com/investors.

As part of our effort to promote improved shareholder engagement, the Board adopted a formal Shareholder Engagement Policy to facilitate an open dialogue and exchange of ideas among the Company, our Board, and our shareholders. The Shareholder Engagement Policy is available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance. Barrick is pleased to host a virtual format for this year’s Meeting in which shareholders can participate by following the instructions in this Circular, and attend regardless of geographic location through an online portal which allows them to ask questions of the Board and management and vote their Barrick Shares. As in past years, Barrick is also offering a live webcast of the Meeting which can be viewed on our website at www.barrick.com/investors/agm. More information can be found in “Meeting and Voting Information – Voting Procedures”.

Shareholders can contact the Chairman by mail (marking the envelope “Confidential”) or email at:

Attention: Chairman
Barrick Gold Corporation
TD Canada Trust Tower
Brookfield Place
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
P.O. Box 212
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Email: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]

Shareholders can contact our independent directors by mail (marking the envelope “Confidential”) or email at:

Attention: Lead Director
Barrick Gold Corporation
TD Canada Trust Tower
Brookfield Place
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
P.O. Box 212
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Email: [email protected]
cc: [email protected]

Shareholders can contact the President and Chief Executive Officer by mail or email at:

Attention: President and Chief Executive Officer
Barrick Gold Corporation
TD Canada Trust Tower
Brookfield Place
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
P.O. Box 212
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Email: [email protected]

Shareholders may communicate their views to management through the Company’s Investor Relations Department at:

Attention: Investor Relations
Barrick Gold Corporation
TD Canada Trust Tower
Brookfield Place
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
P.O. Box 212
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Phone: (416) 307-7474
Email: [email protected]

Our Governance and Leadership Structure

We have consciously established a distinctive structure for the governance and management of Barrick. In this section, we lay out the responsibilities of our Board, our Chairman, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and our Lead Director, and we explain how they work together. We also explain why we continue to believe this is the right structure for Barrick at this time.

Under our Executive Chairman’s stewardship, Barrick undertook a “Back to the Future” strategy to recapture and make relevant the original, authentic DNA of Barrick as it existed when Peter Munk and his partners created it. Specifically, the phrase referred to re-establishing four core elements: one, a partnership culture; two, a lean, nimble, decentralized business model; three, an intensive focus on creating long-term value as measured by free cash flow per share; and four, financial rigor and prudence as evidenced by discerning portfolio management and a healthy balance sheet.

Today, these core elements continue to drive Barrick’s business following the Merger. We have implemented a decentralized operating model, reallocating roles to operations where appropriate, and eliminating those roles that are no longer required. The corporate office sets strategy and allocates people and capital according to the Company’s strategic priorities. Regional Chief Operating Officers determine how best to maximize the long-term value of their business, with advice and assistance from corporate office experts. Those regional leaders work side-by-side with our regional teams to maintain and enhance our license to operate, building partnerships of depth with host governments and communities. This lean, decentralized model allows information to flow freely and swiftly throughout the organization, and ensures that problems are solved quickly by the people closest to them. It also empowers our Partners to work together as a team to understand and manage the complex matters of our business, and assess and reduce risk.

Having re-established the model that drove Barrick’s early success, our ambition is to become the world’s most valued gold and copper mining business. We are cultivating a high-performance culture defined by the following principles: a deep commitment to partnership; consistent high-level execution; operational excellence; disciplined capital allocation; and continual self-improvement. We are obsessed with talent, and seek out fresh perspectives from other industries, challenging ourselves to think differently. We are investing in technology in a disciplined manner to make us faster, safer, more efficient, and more transparent with our partners. Our Board of Directors serves as the voice of all owners. It sets the Company’s strategic priorities in keeping with our purpose and values. The Chairman is a meaningful owner himself and serves as the representative of the Board and the owners. He ensures that the strategic priorities set by the Board are executed to the highest possible standard.

Board of Directors

In carrying out its oversight function, our Board of Directors, as the voice of all owners, reviews with management and sets the Company’s priorities in keeping with our purpose and values.

Partners

Our priorities are executed by our partnership, established in 2015. As at March 20, 2024, we have 37 Partners, 16 of whom are executive officers. Partners are individuals who consistently demonstrate the highest qualities of transformational leadership: a tireless dedication to Barrick’s values, the pursuit of excellence and innovation, and a capacity to motivate and inspire others. Our Partners approach their work with a balance of boldness and prudence: acting with urgency, but also with discipline and care. Our Partners are owners of the Company, and rise and fall together with shareholders. A significant portion of their total compensation is long-term in nature, in the form of PGSUs which convert to Barrick Shares that are subject to the achievement of market-leading minimum common share ownership requirements that reinforce our ownership culture. Ongoing membership is contingent upon superior performance and leadership, and underperforming Partners will be removed.

President and Chief Executive Officer

The President and Chief Executive Officer is appointed by the Board and reports to the Chairman and the Board. The President and Chief Executive Officer has overall responsibility, subject to the oversight of the Chairman and the Board, for managing the Company’s business on a day-to-day basis, general supervision of the business of the Company and the execution of the Company’s operating plans and, working with the Chairman, execution of the Company’s strategic priorities. In fulfilling his executive role, the President and Chief Executive Officer acts within the authority delegated to him by the Chairman and the Board. Among other things, the President and Chief Executive Officer also: (i) monitors operational performance and the strategic direction of the Company, (ii) manages the Company’s internal control framework, (iii) develops appropriate capital, corporate, and management structures to ensure the Company’s objectives are met, and (iv) reports to the Chairman and where appropriate, the Board, on the progress being made by the Company with regard to its strategic objectives, along with the Company’s short-, medium-, and long-term plans.

Chairman

The Chairman is appointed by the Board and, as his primary functions, provides leadership and direction to the Board, and facilitates the operations and deliberations of the Board and the satisfaction of the Board’s functions and responsibilities under its mandate. In connection with the transition of Mr. Thornton to the role of Chairman in February 2024, an updated position description of the Chairman was approved by the Board pursuant to which, in addition to the responsibilities applicable to all other directors, the Chairman’s responsibilities include, among other things, (i) in consultation with the President and Chief Executive Officer, scheduling and setting the agenda for Board meetings; (ii) presiding over meetings of the Board and assuming primary responsibility for the Board’s operation and functioning; (iii) ensuring the Board has adequate resources, reviewing the adequacy and timing of Board materials, and ensuring the appropriate flow of information between management and the Board; (iv) providing leadership to the Board in overseeing the Company’s strategy and supervising management’s progress against the Company’s strategic goals (v) monitoring Board committees in carrying out and reporting responsibilities delegated by the Board; (vi) providing input into the ESG & Nominating Committee on recommendations to the Board for nomination of new directors and Board committee chairs, and on succession plans for the Chairman, Lead Director, and committee chair positions; (vii) ensuring that Board functions are effectively carried out and, where functions have been delegated to Board committees, that the results are reported to the Board on a timely basis; (viii) ensuring that the interests of various stakeholders are considered by the Board; (ix) receiving concerns addressed to the Board from key stakeholders about the Company’s governance, strategy, corporate conduct, business integrity, sustainability and executive compensation programs, and consulting with the President and Chief Executive Officer and other directors, where appropriate, to determine appropriate responses; and (x) taking all reasonable steps to ensure that Board decisions are implemented.

In connection with his leadership and direction of the Board, the Chairman chairs each meeting of the Board and works in consultation with the Lead Director to, among other things, plan and organize the activities of the Board. The Chairman serves as a liaison between the Board and the President and Chief Executive Officer and facilitates communications between the Board and the Company’s shareholders (including, where appropriate, speaking on behalf of the Board, or the Company and representing the Board at official functions and meetings with major shareholders, governments, and other key stakeholders). The Chairman is also responsible for conducting an annual performance evaluation of our President and Chief Executive Officer with input from the Lead Director, and for evaluating Board effectiveness.

Lead Director

Because the Chairman is a former executive who is deemed to not be independent for purposes of applicable securities laws and stock exchange rules until the third anniversary of the transition, Barrick will continue to have a Lead Director for so long as the Chairman is not independent, and the independent directors will continue to elect an independent director to serve as Lead Director following each annual meeting.

The Lead Director provides leadership to the Board and particularly to the independent directors. The Lead Director facilitates the functioning of the Board independently of management, serves as an independent leadership contact for directors and shareholders, and assists in maintaining and enhancing the quality of the Company’s corporate governance. The Board has adopted a robust Lead Director position description, which includes, among other things, the following authority and responsibilities:

  • Consulting with the Chairman regarding the agenda and ultimately approving the agenda (including additions to the agenda) and associated materials for each Board meeting;
  • Approving Board meeting schedules to ensure that there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items;
  • Chairing Board meetings when the Chairman is absent or in circumstances where the Chairman is (or may be perceived to be) conflicted;
  • Presiding over in camera sessions of the independent directors following every Board meeting;
  • Calling meetings of the independent directors, or the Board, as required;
  • Briefing the Chairman on decisions reached or suggestions made at meetings of independent directors, or during in camera sessions;
  • Facilitating communication between the independent directors and the Chairman, including by presenting the Chairman’s views, concerns, and issues to such directors and raising with the Chairman, as appropriate, the views, concerns and issues raised by such directors;
  • Engaging with the Chairman between Board meetings and assisting with informing or engaging with independent directors;
  • Overseeing the annual Board and directors evaluation process;
  • Engaging with each director individually regarding the performance and functioning of the Board, its committees, and other evaluation matters, as appropriate, and inquiring as to whether any director has concerns about the nomination of other directors;
  • Providing input in respect of the Chairman’s annual performance evaluation of the President and Chief Executive Officer;
  • Providing leadership to the Board if circumstances arise in which the Chairman may be (or may be perceived to be) in conflict, in responding to any reported conflicts of interest, or potential conflicts of interest, arising for any director;
  • Being available for consultation and direct communication with shareholders and other key constituents, as appropriate; and
  • Retaining independent advisors on behalf of the Board as the Board or the independent directors may deem necessary or appropriate.

J. Brett Harvey has served as our Lead Director since December 2013. Mr. Harvey was the Chair of Barrick’s Compensation Committee from July 2012 to December 2018 and has been the Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee since January 2019. In 2023, Mr. Harvey played a fundamental role as our Lead Director in a number of key Board initiatives, including consulting with the Chairman regarding the agenda and associated materials for all Board meetings, chairing all meetings of the independent directors that occurred throughout the year, facilitating communication between the independent directors and the Chairman, consulting with the ESG & Nominating Committee in evaluating the Chairman’s performance (in respect of his capacity as Executive Chairman prior to the transition), and providing input into the Chairman’s annual performance evaluation of the President and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, in early 2024, Mr. Harvey participated in discussions with a number of our largest investors representing approximately 40% of the issued and outstanding Barrick Shares (as of March 20, 2024) to discuss a variety of topics, including our performance, sustainability strategy, environmental goals, human capital strategy, and executive compensation matters, as well as key governance priorities, including Board composition, diversity, and renewal. The Board has adopted position descriptions for the Chairman, the Lead Director, and the President and Chief Executive Officer. Each Board committee mandate also sets out the role and responsibilities of its committee chair. A copy of these position descriptions and Board committee mandates can be found on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

Corporate Governance

Through the ESG & Nominating Committee, which is composed entirely of independent directors, the Board monitors best practices in corporate governance, develops corporate governance guidelines, and establishes appropriate structures and policies to allow the Board to function effectively and independently of management. The ESG & Nominating Committee recommends corporate governance policy changes to the Board as appropriate, and the Board approves our corporate governance guidelines annually.

Board Composition and Nomination of Directors

Shareholders elect directors annually to hold office until our next annual meeting or until their successors are elected or appointed. Shareholders vote for individual directors. Between shareholder meetings, the Board may appoint additional directors within the maximum number set out in the Articles of the Company and provided that the number of additional directors appointed cannot exceed one-third of the current directors who were not appointed as additional directors. The Articles of the Company provide for a minimum of five and a maximum of 20 directors.

The ESG & Nominating Committee is charged with identifying and reviewing potential candidates and recommending nominees to the Board for approval. The ESG & Nominating Committee strives to ensure that the Board possesses a broad range of experience and expertise so that it can effectively carry out its mandate and be an asset to the Company, both as a whole and through its three standing committees. To promote this objective, the ESG & Nominating Committee oversees a process by which the areas of experience and expertise that the Board needs over the medium-term are identified.

The table below shows those areas of experience and expertise and indicates the primary areas that the 10 director nominees bring to our Board.

  Bristow Cai Coleman Costantini Greenspun Harvey Kabagambe Quinn Silva Thornton
Mining Operations              
Health, Safety, Environmental & Climate
Capital Allocation & Financial Acumen
Talent Development and Allocation & Partnership Culture
M&A Execution  
International Business Experience & Global Partnerships
Governmental and Regulatory Affairs & Community Relations  
Risk Management  

Descriptions of Areas of Experience and Expertise

  • Mining Operations: Experience at a senior level with mining operations including production, exploration, reserves, capital projects, and related technology. Familiarity with setting performance expectations, driving continuous improvement through Best-in-Class operational standards, building operational leadership capabilities, and fostering innovation.
  • Health, Safety, Environmental & Climate: Knowledge of, or experience with, leading health, safety, environmental and climate practices and related requirements, including sustainable development, climate impacts and climate-focused reporting standards, and corporate responsibility practices and reporting.
  • Capital Allocation & Financial Acumen: Experience overseeing the allocation of capital to ensure superior risk-adjusted financial returns, including strengthening our capital structure, evaluating capital investment decisions, setting and enforcing thresholds for financial returns, optimizing asset portfolios, and knowledge of, or experience with, financial accounting and corporate finance.
  • Talent Development and Allocation & Partnership Culture: Thorough understanding of the key processes to ensure optimal human capital allocation including attracting, motivating, and retaining top talent. Familiarity with partnership structures and their related cultures. Experience in areas such as setting performance objectives, designing compensation plans, ensuring the right people are in the right roles, succession planning, and organizational design.
  • M&A Execution: Experience in evaluating and executing mergers, acquisitions, and asset sales, including the formation of partnerships and joint ventures across the globe.
  • International Business Experience & Global Partnerships: Experience conducting business internationally, including exposure to a range of political, cultural, and regulatory environments. Familiarity with the critical role of partnerships with host governments, local communities, indigenous people, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders, and an understanding of how to establish and strengthen those partnerships.
  • Government and Regulatory Affairs & Community Relations: Experience with the workings of government and public and regulatory policy in Canada, the United States, and internationally. Familiarity with community engagement.
  • Risk Management: Knowledge of risk management principles and practices, an understanding of some or all of the major risk areas that the Company faces, and an ability to probe risk controls and exposures.

We believe our Board nominees must strike the right balance between those who have the skills and experience necessary to ensure our business can secure and maintain our license to operate, and those who have technical and operating expertise and financial and business acumen. Based on their assessment of the existing experience and strengths of the Board and the needs of the organization, the ESG & Nominating Committee and the Board determine the competencies, skills, and qualities Barrick should seek in new Board members. In recommending nominees, the ESG & Nominating Committee assesses the ability to contribute to the effective management of the Company, taking into account the needs of the Company and the individual’s background, experience, perspective, skills, and knowledge that are appropriate and beneficial to the Company. Consistent with Barrick’s Diversity Policy, the Committee and the Board also consider diversity criteria, such as gender, age, ethnicity, and diversity of thought.

Nominees for membership to the Board are recommended to the Board by the ESG & Nominating Committee. In identifying candidates, the Committee consults broadly with the other members of the Board and retains external consultants to assist with sourcing the best available candidates and/or consult with key stakeholders. Throughout the director nomination process, the Committee provides updates to the Board and solicits input on candidates. New candidates are interviewed by members of the Committee and other directors as appropriate. The Committee ultimately submits recommendations on Board composition to the full Board, which approves the nominees for submission to shareholders and election to the Board.

Barrick has nominated 10 directors for election at the Meeting who collectively represent the necessary mosaic of skills and experience that is relevant to our business and who serve as a voice of owners by crafting policies to create long-term value per share and ensuring that Barrick successfully carries out those policies. Our Board includes international business leaders and mining industry professionals with expertise and experience working in all the jurisdictions in which Barrick operates and brings together diverse viewpoints and perspectives, exhibiting the skills, professional experience, and cultural backgrounds necessary to best address the opportunities, challenges, and risks of our business.

The Board will continue to advance state-of-the-art governance practices including a rigorous annual evaluation process, which encompasses peer reviews and an assessment of the effectiveness of the Chairman, the Lead Director, and Board committee chairs.

In furtherance of our commitment to thoughtful Board renewal and diversity, we have appointed seven new directors to the Board since the closing of the Merger on January 1, 2019, including four women directors with diverse backgrounds – Ms. Loreto Silva, Ms. Anne N. Kabagambe, Ms. Helen Cai, and Ms. Isela A. Costantini in August 2019, November 2020, November 2021, and November 2022, respectively – following a rigorous search and selection process overseen by our ESG & Nominating Committee.

This evolution of our Board demonstrates our commitment to refreshing our Board with a view to increasing the diversity of our directors. As a result of a rigorous multi-year Board renewal process overseen by our ESG & Nominating Committee designed to ensure the identification and selection of the best candidates for nomination as directors, having regard to Barrick’s highly specialized business and the key business geographies in which we conduct our global operations, 80% of our director nominees are independent, 40% of our director nominees self-identify as racially and/or ethnically diverse, and women represent 40% of all Barrick director nominees and 50% of our independent directors.

Expectations of Directors

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees. These Guidelines set out how the Board should manage its affairs and perform its responsibilities. Among other things, the Corporate Governance Guidelines establish a minimum attendance expectation for directors of 75% of all Board and committee meetings, subject to extenuating circumstances, and a requirement that directors make every reasonable effort to attend our annual meeting of shareholders. All directors satisfied this requirement in 2023. Additionally, the Corporate Governance Guidelines establish a minimum share ownership requirement for directors. All directors except Ms. Kabagambe, Ms. Cai, and Ms. Costantini have met their shareholder ownership requirements. Ms. Kabagambe, Ms. Cai, and Ms. Costantini have until November 4, 2025, November 3, 2026, and November 2, 2027, respectively, to meet their share ownership requirements.

Majority Voting Policy

The Company has adopted a majority voting policy as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance. The majority voting policy provides that any nominee proposed for election as a director who receives a greater number of votes withheld than votes in favor of his or her election must promptly tender his or her resignation to the Chairman or, in the case of the Chairman, to the Lead Director. Any such resignation will take effect on acceptance by the Board. This policy applies only to uncontested elections of directors where the number of nominees is equal to the number of directors to be elected.

The ESG & Nominating Committee will expeditiously consider the director’s offer to resign and make a recommendation to the Board on whether it should be accepted, provided that the Board must accept the resignation absent exceptional circumstances. The Board will have 90 days to make a final decision and will announce its determination by way of press release, a copy of which will be provided to the TSX in accordance with Barrick’s standard procedure. The director will not participate in any Committee or Board deliberations on their resignation offer. If a resignation is accepted, the Board may appoint a new director to fill the vacancy.

Term Limits

Barrick does not impose term limits on its directors and does not have a retirement age policy for directors as the Board believes that term limits and mandatory retirement are arbitrary mechanisms for removing directors which can result in valuable, experienced directors being forced to leave the Board solely because of length of service or age. Instead, we believe that directors should be assessed based on their ability to continue to make a meaningful contribution. Barrick’s annual performance review of directors assesses the strengths and weaknesses of directors and the contributions they make. In our view, this is a more meaningful way to evaluate the performance of directors and to make determinations about whether a director should be removed due to under performance. SeeAnnual Performance Assessments.

Independence

The Board believes that it must be independent of management to be effective. The Board has adopted director independence standards consistent with the NYSE Standards and National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices and has adopted a policy that requires at least two-thirds of our directors to be independent. To be considered “independent”, the Board must annually make an affirmative determination, by resolution, that the director being reviewed has no material relationship with the Company other than as a director, either directly or indirectly (such as a partner, shareholder, or officer of another entity that has a material relationship with the Company) that could reasonably be expected to interfere with the director’s ability to exercise independent judgment as a director. In each case, the Board broadly considers all relevant facts and circumstances. The threshold for independence is higher for members of the Audit & Risk Committee, as required by Canadian Security Administrators’ National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees and the NYSE Standards, and for members of the Compensation Committee, as required by the NYSE Standards. All members of the Audit & Risk Committee and the Compensation Committee meet the additional Canadian and U.S. independence requirements for membership on public company audit committees and compensation committees.

Generally, a director will not be considered to be “independent” if:

  1. the director is, or has been within the last three years, employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries;
  2. an immediate family member of the director is, or has been within the last three years, employed by the Company as an executive officer;
  3. the director, or an immediate family member, is a current partner of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor;
  4. the director, or an immediate family member, has been within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of the Company’s internal or external auditor and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time;
  5. the director is a current employee of the Company’s internal or external auditor;
  6. an immediate family member of the director is a current employee of the Company’s internal or external auditor and that person participates in the firm’s audit, assurance, or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice;
  7. a director, or an immediate family member, received more than Cdn $75,000 in direct compensation from the Company during any 12-month period within the last three years, other than director and committee fees and pensions or other forms of deferred compensation, so long as such compensation is not contingent on continued service;
  8. a director, or an immediate family member, is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Company’s current executives serve or served at that time on the company’s compensation committee; or
  9. a director, or an immediate family member, is an executive officer or an employee of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount that exceeds in any of the last three fiscal years $1,000,000 or 2% of that company’s consolidated gross revenues, whichever is greater.

An “immediate family member” includes a director’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such director’s home. A director’s service as an executive officer of a not-for-profit organization will not impair his or her independence if, within the preceding three years, the Company’s charitable contributions to the organization in any single fiscal year, in the aggregate, do not exceed the greater of $1,000,000 or 2% of that organization’s latest publicly available consolidated gross revenues. With the assistance of the ESG & Nominating Committee, the Board has considered the relationship to Barrick of each of the director nominees and has determined that eight of the 10 individuals nominated for election as directors at the Meeting are independent as shown in the following table.

Name

Executive Officer

Independent

Not Independent

Reason for Lack of Independence

Mark Bristow

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

Helen Cai

Christopher L. Coleman

Isela A. Costantini

Brian L. Greenspun

J. Brett Harvey

Anne N. Kabagambe

 

 

 

Andrew J. Quinn

Loreto Silva

 

 

 

John L. Thornton(1)

 

Executive Chairman of the Company within the last three years

  1. Mr. Thornton transitioned to the role of Chairman of the Company, a non-executive position, effective as of February 13, 2024.


Outside Board Memberships and Interlocking Board Positions

The Board has not adopted guidelines setting the specific number of other boards and committees on which a director may serve, except that members of the Audit & Risk Committee who serve on the audit committees of more than two other public companies require the approval of the Board and a determination that such service will not impair the ability of such member to contribute effectively to the Audit & Risk Committee. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors should recognize that Board and committee service requires significant time and attention in order to properly discharge their responsibilities, and that service on boards or committees of other organizations should be consistent with the Company’s conflict of interest standards as set out in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Board has adopted guidelines limiting the number of board interlocks that can exist at any time to two, and prohibiting any senior executive of Barrick from serving on the board of directors of another public company if any senior executive of such other company serves on the Board of Barrick. A board interlock occurs when two or more of Barrick’s directors also serve together as directors of another public company. As of March 20, 2024, there are no board interlocks on our Board.

Other Independence Mechanisms

The Board has established other important governance policies and practices to enhance Board independence, including the following:

  • Each committee mandate provides that the committee may engage external advisors at Barrick’s expense.
  • To facilitate open and candid discussion among our directors, our Corporate Governance Guidelines mandate that:

    • an in camera session follows every Board meeting (including special meetings), at which the independent directors meet without the non-independent directors and without any other officers or employees present; and
    • the Lead Director presides at each of these sessions.

Ethical Business Conduct

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) that applies to all of our directors, officers, employees, contract employees, and third-party vendors. The Code embodies our commitment to conduct our business in accordance with the highest ethical standards and all applicable laws and regulations, industry practices, and international norms. The Code sets out fundamental principles that guide the Board in its deliberations and shape the Company’s business activities. The Code forms the cornerstone of Barrick’s compliance program and was most recently reviewed in 2023 to reflect best practices and ensure that Barrick continues to hold itself to the highest standards of ethical business conduct. The Code addresses, among other things:

  • compliance with laws, including laws prohibiting bribery and corruption;
  • respect for human rights;
  • accurate financial controls and records;
  • avoidance of conflicts of interest;
  • protection and proper use of Company assets;
  • confidentiality of information;
  • insider trading and non-disclosure of material, non-public information;
  • fairness in all our dealings;
  • health and safety in the workplace;
  • dignity and respect within working relationships; and
  • sound environmental practices.

The Code also deals with the reporting of potential violations of law and the Code. Barrick has established a toll-free compliance hotline and Internet web portal to allow for anonymous reporting of any suspected Code violations, including concerns regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or other auditing matters. The Company encourages and expects our personnel to raise possible ethical issues and will not tolerate retaliatory action against any individual for raising, in good faith, concerns or questions regarding ethics or Code matters. Any waivers of the Code may generally only be granted by the President and Chief Executive Officer or the General Counsel. However, any waiver of the Code for executive officers may only be granted by the Board or a committee thereof and will be disclosed to shareholders as required by applicable laws. To date, no waivers of our Code have been granted. The Code was developed in consultation with the Audit & Risk Committee. The Board monitors compliance with the Code through the Audit & Risk Committee, which receives periodic reports from management with respect to any reports of alleged violations of the Code and any corrective actions taken by the Company. At a minimum, once each year, employees are required to complete an acknowledgment confirming that they:

  • have received Code training;
  • understand and agree to abide by the requirements of the Code; and
  • are not aware of any potential misconduct under the Code that has not been reported to appropriate Company management.

The Company has also implemented an online component to its Code training programs. This training provides employees with real-time training and testing and supplements the Company’s other training programs and annual certification process.

Our Code is available on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com/about/governance and on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

Conflict of Interest

In addition to the independence requirements described above, our Code, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the BCBCA specifically address conflicts of interest involving directors. Pursuant to the Code, all of our directors are required to act in the best interests of the Company and to avoid conflicts of interest. Directors may not use their position to obtain any improper benefit for themselves. Our directors may not serve as officers or directors of, or otherwise be engaged with, a competitor or potential or actual business partner of the Company without the prior written approval of the Chairman and the Chair of the ESG & Nominating Committee.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are required to advise the Chairman and the Chair of the ESG & Nominating Committee prior to accepting a directorship of another public company or of any actual or potential competitor, business partner, or significant investor in the Company and to ensure that such service is consistent with Barrick’s conflict of interest standards.

Division 3 of Part 5 of the BCBCA addresses conflicts of interest of a director of a British Columbia company, such as Barrick. Among other things, the BCBCA provides that a director of a corporation who: (a) has a material interest in a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with the corporation; or (b) is a director or an officer of, or has a material interest in, any person who has a material interest in a material contract or transaction or proposed material contract or transaction with the corporation, is required to disclose that interest. Disclosure must be in writing to the directors, must include the nature and extent of the disclosable interest and must be evidenced in a consent resolution, the minutes of a meeting or any other record deposited in the company’s records office. If a director has a disclosable interest in a contract or transaction proposed to be entered into with Barrick, the director may not vote on any resolution to approve the contract or transaction. The director is, however, entitled to be counted in the quorum for the Board meeting. The BCBCA contains a number of exemptions for particular situations, including certain contracts or transactions with wholly owned subsidiaries, a contract of indemnity or insurance for the director, and contracts or transactions relating to the remuneration of the director in his or her capacity as a director, officer, agent or employee of the company or an affiliate.

Related Party Transactions 

Barrick has instituted a number of procedural safeguards designed to ensure that any related party transactions are identified and addressed in accordance with the requirements of our Code and applicable law. As noted above, under the Code all directors and executive officers are required to avoid conflicts of interest and to disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest. In addition, each year, directors and executive officers are required to complete questionnaires in which they identify the names of their related parties and any existing or potential related party transactions or conflicts of interest that could be material to the Company. The information disclosed in these questionnaires is then cross referenced against payments made by the Company to ensure compliance with our internal protocols and our Code. The Audit & Risk Committee reviews related party transactions as part of its oversight of the Company’s Code compliance program. The ESG & Nominating Committee reviews related party transactions involving directors as part of its annual director independence assessment. Where appropriate, the Board will form a committee of independent directors to review and evaluate a potential related party transaction that is material to the Company. There were no material related party transactions reported in 2023.

For purposes of the foregoing, a “related party” of the Company includes, among other things, (i) any director or executive officer of the Company, (ii) an immediate family member of a director or executive officer, (iii) any entity controlled or jointly controlled by any such persons; and (iv) a person that beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, voting securities carrying 10% or more of the voting rights attached to the outstanding Barrick Shares.

Anti-Hedging Policy

The Company has a formal Anti-Hedging Policy prohibiting all directors, officers, senior vice-presidents, vice-presidents, Partners covered by the Partnership Plan, and others from hedging the economic exposure of their share ownership and equity-based long-term incentive compensation. Our Anti-Hedging Policy ensures that our interests and the interests of our shareholders are one and the same.

Procedures for Complaints Regarding Accounting Matters and Auditor Independence Mechanisms

The Audit & Risk Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters, and for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. These procedures are posted on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

PwC is independent within the meaning of the rules of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and, as required by the relevant SEC rules, Barrick’s lead audit partner at PwC rotates every five years (including most recently in February 2021). In addition, the Audit & Risk Committee has adopted the Audit Services Policy for the pre-approval of services performed by Barrick’s auditor. The objective of the Audit Services Policy is to specify the scope of services permitted to be performed by the Company’s auditor and to ensure that the independence of the Company’s auditor is not compromised through engaging the auditor for other services. All services provided by the Company’s auditor are pre-approved by the Audit & Risk Committee as they arise or through an annual pre-approval of services and related fees. All services performed by Barrick’s auditor comply with the Audit Services Policy, and professional standards and securities regulations governing auditor independence.

As part of its annual evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of Barrick’s auditor, the Audit & Risk Committee considered various factors, including: PwC’s ability to exercise independent judgment and objectivity in the course of its audit; its global capabilities relative to the global business of the Company; its familiarity with Barrick’s operations and business, accounting policies and practices and internal controls over financial reporting; appropriateness of fees; and tenure, during which the Audit & Risk Committee evaluated the benefits of long tenure in light of the controls in place to safeguard auditor independence.

The Audit & Risk Committee has established a hiring policy for employees or former employees of the external auditor. Under our hiring policy, the Company shall not employ a person as its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Chief Accounting Officer (or in an equivalent position) if: (1) such person is, or was within the two years prior to becoming employed by the Company, an employee or partner of an independent auditor that audited the Company’s financial statements during such two-year period, and he or she participated in any capacity in such audits, or (2) the hiring of such person would otherwise violate the restrictions set forth in, or established pursuant to, Section 206 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Board Orientation and Continuing Education

New members of the Board are provided with information about their roles, responsibilities, and duties as Board members, as well as information about the Company, its business, and the factors that affect its performance. They receive orientation packages that contain information concerning key legal requirements, the Company’s Articles, the duties and responsibilities of directors, the mandates of the Board and its committees, the Company’s key policies, including our Code, and copies of our public disclosure documents.

In addition to meeting with the Chairman, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the other members of senior management to discuss the nature and operation of our business, new directors participate in targeted orientation sessions, carried out over several days, which address multiple topics that are critical to understanding our business. In 2023, in connection with the most recent appointment of a new director to the Board, the topics covered at these orientation sessions included:

  • Regional Operations Overview: Overview of each of Barrick’s operating regions; operational targets and regional growth strategies; key assets and related risks and opportunities; business improvement initiatives; health and safety; environment; workforce diversity; and major projects.
  • Capital Projects Overview: Overview of key growth and sustaining capital projects; capital initiatives; and principal investment risks and mitigation strategies.
  • Finance Function: Overview of the financial aspects of Barrick’s business and assets, including free cash flow generation strategy; cost management initiatives; financial risk oversight and cost and liability management; balance sheet management, share buybacks, and dividends strategy; supply chain and inventory management; GHG supply chain management; digital initiatives; license to operate initiatives; and portfolio production outlook.
  • Mineral Resource Management: Overview of Barrick’s approach to mineral resource management; reserve replacement plans for key assets; strategic filters driving investment; and case study review.
  • Exploration and Growth: Overview of Barrick’s mineral exploration process; Barrick’s exploration profile and outlook; Barrick’s exploration system, process, and strategy; and license to operate and ESG principles in the exploration context.
  • Human Resources: Overview of Barrick’s talent management strategy approach to succession planning and talent development and training; labor and industrial relations; Barrick’s emphasis on diversity and inclusion; approach to executive compensation; compensation and share ownership philosophy; shareholder engagement; partner and non-partner compensation; and digital cost-reduction initiatives in the human resources context.
  • Strategic Matters: Overview of Barrick’s strategic matters function and responsibilities; investment filters and approach to identifying, considering, and evaluating strategic opportunities (including acquisitions, divestitures, and joint ventures); summary and analysis of recent select transactions; and director responsibilities for strategic oversight of the Company.
  • Legal and Corporate Governance: Overview of Barrick’s legal department, including corporate and regional responsibilities, litigation management, and strategic matters and transactional responsibilities; director duties and responsibilities; key Company policies and guidelines; corporate governance principles; and public disclosure obligations.
  • Sustainability and ESG: Overview of Barrick’s sustainability and ESG priorities, policies and practices and Sustainability Scorecard; Barrick’s climate change strategy; sustainability and ESG oversight; stakeholder engagement strategy and sustainability disclosure.
  • Audit Approach: Introduction of the external auditing team; overview of the approach to auditing and the interaction between the independent auditor and Barrick; and details of accounting matters unique to the mining industry.
  • Communications and Investor Relations: Overview of Barrick’s communications and investor relations function and strategy; key responsibilities and communications streams; and management of internal communications

On an ongoing basis, directors:

  • receive a comprehensive package of information prior to each Board and committee meeting;
  • receive reports on the work of committees of the Board following committee meetings;
  • participate in information sessions at Board and committee meetings on specific aspects of our business operations such as key development projects, financial risk management programs, corporate development and exploration strategies and activities, and corporate social responsibility activities;
  • have full access to our senior management and employees;
  • receive updates as appropriate between Board meetings on matters that affect our business and operations;
  • participate in continuing education sessions that are incorporated into every regularly scheduled Board meeting and certain meetings of committees of the Board; and
  • are encouraged to participate in other available educational opportunities, at the Company’s expense, that would further their understanding of our business and enhance their performance on the Board.

Board Educational Sessions Held in 2023  

In 2023, the directors attended the educational sessions set out below.

Date Topic of Education Session Bristow Cai Cisneros(1) Coleman Costantini Evans Greenspun Harvey Kabagambe Quinn Silva Thornton
February 2023 Health and Safety
Review of risk management approaches to health and safety matters; health and safety assurance, audit and assessment frameworks; Barrick health and safety SWOT analysis; and Barrick’s health and safety performance, including review of significant safety incidents at Barrick properties.
May 2023 Mineral Exploration
Review of industry exploration approach and trends; exploration initiatives and objectives; exploration profile and outlook; and asset-specific exploration opportunities.
August 2023 Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management and Membership in the International Council on Metals & Mining
Review of proposed GISTM and timeline to adoption; tailings management standards and case studies; and Barrick’s membership in and contributions to the ICMM, including updates on matters relating to climate change, nature and biodiversity, and industry standards.
August 2023 Pueblo Viejo Site Visit
Site visit to the Pueblo Viejo Mine in the Dominican Republic to monitor operational progress and evaluate key risks.
       
November 2023 Reputation and Social License to Operate
Review of industry-wide challenges and opportunities for mining companies from a reputational and license to operate perspective; license to operate framework; and case studies.
 
  1. Mr. Cisneros ceased to be a director on December 29, 2023.

Annual Performance Assessments

The Board, its committees, and individual directors participate in an annual assessment process. For 2023, the Lead Director jointly interviewed the directors to obtain feedback on priorities, the operation of the Board and its committees, and opportunities to enhance their effectiveness. The interviews included director peer reviews and specific questions relating to the effectiveness of the Chairman, the Lead Director, and the Committee Chairs. The results of the assessment process were reviewed with the Board. The Lead Director provided individual feedback to directors based on the peer reviews.

Clawback Policy and Executive Officer Recovery Policy

Barrick’s Clawback Policy subjects incentive compensation paid or granted to the President and Chief Executive Officer; Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer; Senior Executive Vice-President, Strategic Matters; Chief Operating Officer, Latin America and Asia Pacific; Chief Operating Officer, Africa and Middle East; and other select senior employees to clawback in cases of a material financial misstatement or a determination by the Board that wrongful conduct had occurred, in each case, that resulted in a participant receiving a higher amount of incentive compensation than would have been received absent the material misstatement or wrongful conduct, as applicable. The full text of our Clawback Policy is available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance

In addition to the Clawback Policy, in November 2023, Barrick adopted an Executive Officer Recovery Policy that complies with Section 10D of the Exchange Act, Rule 10D-1 of the Exchange Act and the applicable NYSE Standards which, among other things, requires Barrick to promptly recover any specified incentive compensation received by any current or former executive officer in the event of an accounting restatement required due to material noncompliance by the Company with any financial reporting requirements under securities laws applicable to the Company in connection with its listing on the NYSE. The foregoing summary is for informational purposes only and is qualified by the full text of our Executive Officer Recovery Policy, which is available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

Report on Voting Results from the 2023 Annual Meeting

The voting results on the matters submitted to the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders held on May 2, 2023 were as follows:

Item 1: Election of Directors

  Nominee Votes For% ForVotes Withheld% Withheld
  D. Mark Bristow1,074,974,15199.48%5,585,5100.52%
  Helen Cai1,049,777,73097.15%30,781,9312.85%
  Gustavo A. Cisneros936,611,36986.68%143,948,29213.32%
Christopher L. Coleman1,002,380,93992.76%78,178,7227.24%
  Isela A. Costantini1,068,790,36398.91%11,769,2981.09%
  J. Michael Evans970,278,80289.79%110,280,85910.21%
  Brian L. Greenspun1,050,476,72497.22%30,082,9372.78%
  J. Brett Harvey925,858,60085.68%154,701,06114.32%
  Anne N. Kabagambe1,067,501,29198.79%13,058,3701.21%
  Andrew J. Quinn1,067,847,10398.82%12,712,5581.18%
  Loreto Silva1,069,069,77398.94%11,489,8881.06%
  John L. Thornton885,026,94881.90%195,532,71318.10%

Item 2: Appointment of Auditor

Votes For% ForVotes Withheld% Withheld
1,030,143,79685.65%172,551,41914.35%

Item 3: Advisory Resolution on Executive Compensation Approach

Votes For% ForVotes Against% Against
837,461,29577.53%242,706,95822.47%

 

Schedule B: Mandate of the Board of Directors

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Mandate

The Board of Directors (the Board) is responsible for the stewardship of Barrick Gold Corporation (the Company) and for the supervision of the management of the business and affairs of the Company.

Directors shall exercise their business judgment in a manner consistent with their fiduciary duties. In particular, directors are required to act honestly and in good faith, with a view to the best interests of the Company and to exercise the care, diligence and skills that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances.

Responsibilities

The Board discharges its responsibility for supervising the management of the business and affairs of the Company by delegating the day-to-day management of the Company to the senior executives. The Board relies on the senior executives to keep it apprised of all significant developments affecting the Company and its operations.

The Board discharges its responsibilities directly and through delegation to its Committees.

The Board’s responsibilities include:

Oversight of Management

  1. Adopting a succession planning process and participating in the selection, appointment, and development of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives.
  2. Through the Environmental, Social, Governance & Nominating Committee and the Compensation Committee, adopting a process for the evaluation and compensation of the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and other senior executives.
  3. Through the actions of the Board and its individual directors and through the Board’s interaction with and expectations of the senior executives, promoting a culture of integrity throughout the Company consistent with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, taking appropriate steps to, to the extent feasible, satisfy itself as to the integrity of the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives of the Company, and that the Chairman, the Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives create a culture of integrity throughout the Company.
  4. Periodically reviewing and approving any significant changes to the Company’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
  5. Developing and approving position descriptions for each of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer and measuring the performance of those acting in such capacities against such position descriptions.

Financial and Risk Matters

  1. Overseeing the reliability and integrity of accounting principles and practices followed by management, of the financial statements and other publicly reported financial information, and of the disclosure principles and practices followed by management.
  2. Overseeing the integrity of the Company’s internal controls and management information systems by adopting appropriate internal and external audit and control systems.
  3. Reviewing and approving an annual operating budget for the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and monitoring the Company’s performance against such budget.
  4. Approving annual and, either directly or through the Audit & Risk Committee, quarterly financial statements and the release thereof by management.
  5. Reviewing and discussing with management the processes utilized by management with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including the identification by management of the principal risks of the business of the Company, including financial risks, and the implementation by management of appropriate systems to deal with such risks.

Business Strategy

  1. Adopting a strategic planning process pursuant to which management develops and proposes, and the Board reviews and approves, significant corporate strategies and objectives, taking into account the opportunities and risks of the business.
  2. Reviewing and approving all major acquisitions, dispositions and investments and all significant financings and other significant matters outside the ordinary course of the Company’s business.
  3. Reviewing management’s implementation of appropriate community and environmental stewardship and health and safety management systems, taking into consideration applicable laws, Company policies and accepted practices in the mining industry.

Communications and Reporting

  1. Overseeing the Company’s continuous disclosure program with a view to satisfying itself that material information is disseminated in a timely fashion.
  2. Periodically reviewing and approving any significant changes to the Company’s Disclosure Policy.
  3. Adopting a process to enable shareholders to communicate directly with the Lead Director or with the chairperson of the Environmental, Social, Governance & Nominating Committee.

Corporate Governance

  1. Overseeing the development of the Company’s approach to corporate governance, including reviewing and approving changes to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which Guidelines shall set out the expectations of directors, including basic duties and responsibilities with respect to attendance at Board meetings and advance review of meeting materials.
  2. Taking appropriate steps to remain informed about the Board’s duties and responsibilities and about the business and operations of the Company.
  3. Ensuring that the Board receives from senior executives the information and input required to enable the Board to effectively perform its duties.
  4. Developing and approving position descriptions for each of the Lead Director and the Chairperson of each Board Committee and measuring the performance of those acting in such capacities against such position descriptions.
  5. Overseeing, through the Environmental, Social, Governance & Nominating Committee and the Lead Director, the review of the effectiveness of the Board, its Committees and individual directors on an annual basis.

Board Organization

  1. Establishing committees of the Board and delegating certain Board responsibilities to these committees, consistent with the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.

 

Schedule C: Key Characteristics of the Performance Granted Share Unit (PGSU) Awards

KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PERFORMANCE GRANTED SHARE UNIT (PGSU) AWARDS

Characteristics

Description

Eligibility

Partners.

Maximum Potential Award

Awards under this plan are determined by multiplying: (a) a multiple, which varies by job level, of base salary (ranging from three to six times) determined annually by the Compensation Committee, and (b) a performance factor between 0% and 100% based on a multi-year performance assessment evaluated using the Long-Term Company Scorecard.

Minimum Award

0% of Maximum Potential Award.

% of Total Long-Term Incentive

100% of Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Awards.

Term

Awards granted vest in one-third increments on the 12-month, 24-month, and 33-month anniversary of the date of grant (or, if the corresponding anniversary of the grant date falls during a Blackout Period, on the second trading day following the expiration of the Blackout Period), plus a requirement to hold Barrick Shares until the earlier of achieving the share ownership requirements or until termination of employment.

Vesting Criteria

PGSUs vest in one-third increments on the 12-month, 24-month, and 33-month anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to further holding restrictions. If the corresponding anniversary of the grant date falls during a Blackout Period, the vesting date is on the second trading day following the expiration of the Blackout Period. Barrick Shares must be held until the earlier of achieving the applicable share ownership requirement (after which any Barrick Shares in excess of the requirement may be sold) or termination of employment or resignation. See “Post-Vesting Treatment, Prohibitions, and Restriction Period” below for more detail.

Committee Discretion

The Compensation Committee has the authority to waive the prohibitions on the sale, transfer, or other disposition of any or all the Barrick Shares held by a participant, determined on a case-by-case basis, without shareholder approval.

 

The value of the LTI award is within the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee, and the Compensation Committee has authority to increase or reduce any award implied from the Long-Term Company Scorecard. Specifically, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to approve a different payout level from that calculated according to the Long-Term Company Scorecard to ensure that the payout is appropriate.

Pricing at Time of Grant

Conversion from dollar value to units based on the volume-weighted average trading price of Barrick Shares on the last five Trading Days immediately preceding the date of grant on the TSX or NYSE, as applicable, or, if the Grant Date occurs during a Blackout Period or during the five Trading Days immediately following a Blackout Period, be based on the five day volume-weighted average trading price following the expiration of the Blackout Period.

Vesting

At vesting, each PGSU award (grant plus dividend equivalents) will have a value equal to the closing price of Barrick Shares on the TSX or the NYSE, as applicable, on the vesting date multiplied by the number of PGSUs (including dividend equivalents accrued during the vesting period, where applicable) having vested.

Post-Vesting Treatment, Prohibitions, and Restriction Period

  • When PGSUs vest, the value vested (less appropriate taxes and other withholdings required by Applicable Law) is used by a third-party administrative agent to purchase Barrick Shares on the open market.
  • Barrick Shares purchased (referred to as Restricted Shares) are subject to sale, transfer, hedging, and pledging prohibitions until the earlier of achieving the minimum share ownership requirements or termination of employment.
  • Subject to the restrictions above, during the Restriction Period, participants have all incidents of ownership associated with the Restricted Shares, including voting rights and entitlements to cash dividends paid on Barrick Shares.
  • Restricted Shares are held by the third-party administrative agent through termination of employment (unless sold in accordance with the terms of the PGSU Plan) and prohibitions lapse and cease to apply on Restricted Shares based on the circumstances surrounding termination, as determined in the section below.

Treatment on
Termination

Termination Event

Unvested PGSUs(1)

Restricted Shares(2)

PGSUs: Termination Without Cause, Retirement, or Resignation (except for purpose of joining or providing services to a Competitor).

  • For termination without cause, prorated portion of unvested PGSUs vest based on actual performance achieved and proportion of vesting period worked; all remaining unvested PGSUs lapse and are forfeited.
  • For resignation, all unvested PGSUs lapse and are forfeited
  • For retirement (defined as Age 60 for the purposes of the Plan), unvested PGSUs continue to vest according to their vesting schedule, provided that the employee does not join, or provide services to, a Competitor (as defined in the PGSU Plan) during the continued vesting period. If the employee subsequently joins or provides services to a Competitor during the continued vesting period, all PGSUs that have not vested at such time lapse and are forfeited. If retirement occurs prior to a Change in Control, any remaining unvested PGSUs will vest and be paid out on or before the completion of the Change in Control.
  • Prohibitions lapse and cease to apply to all Restricted Shares upon termination of employment.

 

 

Disability or Death

                 

  • Unvested PGSUs vest on the termination date or date of death, as applicable (except for U.S. Participants, whose unvested PGSUs continue to vest based on the normal schedule).
  • Prohibitions lapse and cease to apply to all Restricted Shares on the termination date or date of death, as applicable.

Resignation or Retirement Related to Joining, or Providing Services to, a Competitor or Termination With Cause.

  • All unvested PGSUs lapse and are forfeited.
  • Prohibitions lapse and cease to apply to all Restricted Shares in three tranches:
    • 50% of the Restricted Shares on the Termination Date;
    • 25% of the Restricted Shares on the first anniversary of the Termination Date; and
    • 25% of the Restricted Shares on the second anniversary of the Termination Date.

Termination of Employment Without Cause Within Two Years Following a Change in Control.

  • Unvested PGSUs vest on the termination date (except for U.S. Participants, whose unvested PGSUs continue to vest based on the normal schedule).
  • Prohibitions lapse and cease to apply to Restricted Shares pursuant to a bona fide third-party take-over bid provided that the take-over bid is successfully completed.

Dividend Equivalents

Dividends are credited or paid as and when declared.

  • For unvested PGSUs, dividends are credited as additional units during the vesting period, at the same rate as the dividends paid on Barrick Shares.

 

  • For Restricted Shares, dividends are paid in cash as and when declared on Barrick Shares (other than stock dividends or other distributions paid in the form of additional Barrick Shares, which shall be treated as Restricted Shares).

Form of Payment

On and beyond termination, the form of payment varies with unvested PGSUs and Restricted Shares.

  • Unvested PGSUs that become immediately vested on termination are paid in cash (less applicable tax and withholdings).
  • Unvested PGSUs that continue to vest normally beyond termination are paid in cash (less applicable tax and withholdings) at the end of the normal vesting period.
  • Restricted Shares may be sold in the open market for cash proceeds (or otherwise disposed of) when prohibitions lapse and cease to apply.

Clawback

PGSUs are subject to the Clawback Policy and the Executive Officer Recovery Policy. For details, the full text of these policies are available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

  1. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, accelerate vesting of all or a portion of the then unvested PGSUs.
  2. The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, waive the prohibitions on the sale, transfer, or other disposition of the Restricted Shares with respect to any or all Restricted Shares held by the employee at any time and from time to time.

 

Schedule D: Key Characteristic of the Restricted Share Unit (RSU) Awards

KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT (RSU) AWARDS

Characteristics Description
Maximum Potential Award 100% of the target number of RSUs granted.
Minimum Award 100% of the target number of RSUs granted, subject to clawback.
Term 33 months.
Vesting Criteria Vest up to three years from the date of grant.
Committee Discretion The Compensation Committee has the discretion to designate the vesting date for RSUs at the time of grant, which may result in grants that vest in less than three years.
Pricing at Time of Grant Conversion from dollar value to units based on the volume-weighted average trading price of Barrick Shares on the last five Trading Days immediately preceding the date of grant on the TSX or NYSE, as applicable.
Dividend Equivalents Credited as additional units during the vesting period, at the same rate as the dividends paid on Barrick Shares.
Payout Value At vesting, each RSU award (grant plus dividend equivalents) will have a value equal to the volume-weighted average trading price of Barrick Shares on the TSX or the NYSE, as applicable, on the last five Trading Days immediately preceding the vesting date multiplied by the number of RSUs (including dividend equivalents accrued during the vesting period, where applicable). The Compensation Committee has the discretion to adjust awards in unusual circumstances.
Form of Settlement The Compensation Committee has the discretion to designate the form of settlement for RSUs at the time of grant, which may result in grants settled in cash or in After-Tax Shares upon vesting.
Post-Vesting Treatment,
Prohibitions, and Restriction
Period
The Compensation Committee has the discretion to apply restrictions on sale, transfer, encumbrance, or other disposition on any awards settled in After-Tax Shares.
Clawback RSUs are subject to the Clawback Policy and the Executive Officer Recovery Policy. For details, the full text of these policies are available on our website at www.barrick.com/about/governance.

 

Schedule E: Shareholder Proposal

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

The following shareholder proposal was jointly submitted for consideration at the Meeting by Michael and Julie Alison Baggott of 2257 Wallingford Way, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K0A 2T0 and Thilo Hackenberg of Rostocker Str. 39, Berlin, Germany, 13059, each of whom is represented by Ekō. The proponents of the proposal have collectively owned 278 Barrick Shares for an uninterrupted two-year period prior to submitting the proposal, thus satisfying the minimum holding requirements. The proposal and its supporting statement represent the views of the shareholders who submitted it and contain statements and information supplied exclusively by such shareholders.

An unedited copy of the proposal is set out below in italics, together with the Board’s response.

Proposal: Independent Third Party Audit of Environmental Water Impacts

Resolved: Shareholders request the board of directors to commission an independent third-party audit to assess the environmental water impacts of planned and current operations of Barrick mines. Input from stakeholders, including local civil society organizations and affected community members, should be considered in determining the specific scope and guidelines for the assessment. A report on the audit, prepared at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, should be published on the company’s website within 12 months with an interim progress report by close of the fourth quarter of 2024.

Whereas: Barrick Gold’s operations have been found to harm water supplies in multiple mining locations. Such impacts cause significant damage to local communities and community opposition to the company’s license to operate(1) and led a major institutional investor, Norway’s Government Pension Fund, to divest its holdings; a ban is in place to this day. The pension fund’s Council of Ethics concluded that investment in Barrick amounted to “an unacceptable risk of the Fund contributing to serious environmental damage” and that “the company’s assertions that its operations do not cause long-term and irreversible environmental damage carry little credibility. This is reinforced by the lack of openness and transparency in the company’s environmental reporting.(2)

Such damage combined with a lack of transparency weaken long term value and increase material risks to the company and investors.

Controversies have included:

  • Chile’s Supreme Court ratified the definitive closure of the Pascua Lama gold and copper mining project, previously ordered to shut down by the country’s environmental regulator.(3)
  • A group of institutional investors accused the company of misleading statements related to Pascua Lama’s compliance with environmental regulations and alleged artificial stock inflation due to this lack of disclosure leading to a $140 million settlement.(4)
  • Accusations that the Veladero mine in Argentina is releasing toxins into the local water supply – after similar incidents in previous years – spurred the country to pass legislation and forced the mine to temporarily close.(5)
  • The Argentinian Secretaries of Environment and Mining are being sued in federal court for lack of action on Barrick’s violations of environmental regulations at the reopened Veladero mine which would lead to revocation of the company’s license to operate.(6)
  • An independent review of the Environmental Impact Assessment commissioned by Barrick to expand the Pueblo Viejo mine in the Dominican Republic found no plans for long term maintenance of the proposed tailings dam and that “the eventual collapse of the dam with numerous fatalities and with contamination of the Maguaca and Yuna Rivers to Samana Bay should be regarded as inevitable.” Barrick has not disclosed any mitigation plans to address these findings.
  • Disclosure of the Pueblo Viejo report was withheld for 9 months. When released an expert review identified significant deficiencies including, the EIS is not complete. Many important data are contained in documents that have not yet been written, many important sections (such as the analysis of the consequences of tailings dam failure) are available only in English, and the scoring of the various accounts and subaccounts for the multiple accounts analysis (multi-criteria alternatives analysis) is missing completely.”

In all of these incidents, there are concerns about the lack of timely and accurate reporting by the company and the implications for local communities and investors.(7) Both require transparent, independently verified information on the risks and harms related to the company’s operations – information not available in the limited reporting currently available. An independent audit of environmental impacts on water resources in the locations of Barrick mines would provide local communities with clear information on those operations’ impacts, the company with an independent measure of its impacts, and investors with a reliable analysis of risks and performance.

(1)     https://financialpost.com/commodities/mining/barrick-gold-lost-its-social-licence-in-papua-new-guinea-this-is-the-price-its-paying-to-earn-it-back
(2)     https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/upload/fin/etikk/recommendation_barrick.pdf, p.25
(3)     https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/chile-top-court-ratifies-closure-canadian-owned-pascua-lama-mining-project-2022-07-14/
(4)     https://www.responsible-investor.com/union-barrick-settle/
(5)     https://financialpost.com/commodities/mining/barrick-facing-new-allegations-of-contamination-near-veladero-mine-in-argentina
(6)     https://www.tiempoar.com.ar/informacion-general/barrick-gold-mercurio-rio-jachal/
(7)     https://www.responsible-invehttps://miningwatch.ca/sites/default/files/EIS_SteveEmerman_PuebloViejo_2023.pdfstor.com/union­barrick-settle/ 


BOARD RESPONSE TO THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL

The Board recommends voting AGAINST the proposal for the following reasons:

Following careful consideration of the proposal, as well as engagement with the proposal’s proponents, the Board believes the proposal is not in the best interests of the Company, is redundant to the Company’s existing practices, and would result in needless cost and waste of corporate resources with no corresponding benefit to the Company, its stakeholders (including its shareholders), its host country partners, or members of local communities neighbouring the Company’s operating mines and projects. This is particularly so in light of our ongoing sustainability programs and initiatives, the Company’s transparent reporting practices, and the fact that the alleged controversies referenced in the proposal date back as far as 2008 and have been appropriately fact-checked, contextualized, and discredited in prior public filings and statements by the Company.

Leading Water Management Practices

Barrick’s approach to water management is codified in our Environmental Policy, which was updated following the Merger in 2019 to reflect our renewed sustainability vision, as well as our standalone Water Policy. Managing and using water responsibly is a critical part of our sustainability strategy. We recognize that access to water is both a fundamental human right and critical for the effective operation of our mines.

We have a transparent and methodical approach to water stewardship, built on four central pillars:

  • Conserve and protect;
  • Consider other users;
  • Site-wide and catchment-wide water balances, monitoring and management plans; and
  • Honest and open disclosure.

In addition to the overarching environmental commitments set forth in our Environmental Policy, our standalone Water Policy requires the Company to adhere to the following standards (among others):

  • Develop and implement site-wide water quality monitoring programs and management plans to limit the negative impacts of our water usage on our own activities, the environment, and the health and safety of the communities in which we operate;
  • Report our water performance in accordance with the ICMM Water Reporting Framework, and in compliance with applicable law; and
  • Engage with governments, local authorities, and other stakeholders on approaches to integrated water management.

All of our operations, and any proposed project, must undergo an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) that not only meets in-country environmental permitting requirements and legislation, but satisfies international best practices, such as the International Finance Corporation Performance Standards. These ESIAs are undertaken by a team of multi-disciplinary independent specialists, who are experts in their respective fields. The ESIAs include an Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP), which includes mitigation and management requirements, as well as detailed monitoring programmes that are determined by the independent specialists and put forward to the respective authorities for consideration during the permitting and decision-making processes. The ESIA process also includes extensive stakeholder engagement and consultation, including baseline assessments, sharing of potential impacts, and inputs into the ESMP.

When an environmental permit or water permit is issued, the ESMP becomes a legally binding document upon which our future compliance is assessed, along with other permit conditions, such as water conditions including but not limited to abstraction sources and volumes, water conservation commitments, water quality thresholds, and strict discharge requirements, if any.

Each mine has its own site-specific water management plan, which considers the different water sources available, local climate conditions, and the needs of local users and the mine. We include water risks in each mine’s operational risk register.

The specific audit requirements associated with each ESMP are determined by each of our host country’s respective legislation, but generally include independent specialist oversight, regulatory body assessments, and consistent and frequent submission of monitoring data. Barrick’s water quality testing is undertaken by third-party independent laboratories. We monitor and measure any withdrawal and discharge through a variety of methods, including a combination of flow meters and the use of infrastructure design specifications. Water balances at each mine differentiate water source quality withdrawals (high quality or low quality) from each of the following sources: precipitation, surface water, groundwater, seawater, waste water, and third-party water. To increase the specificity of our data, catchments are also distinguished.

As a result of our extensive water monitoring process, which feeds into each site’s design and operational procedures, the majority of the water we discharge is high quality and suitable for agricultural or potable use.

Transparent and Independently-Assured Water Disclosure

In addition to legislated water quality requirements, Barrick undertakes additional sampling through community participatory monitoring, whereby a committee is established with representatives from the community and other local stakeholders to sample water sources and track the process throughout the chain of custody – from the field, to the laboratory, to the analysis of the results. This ensures full transparency is maintained and community members are informed about the water quality in their communities.

Beyond this community-based transparency, Barrick voluntarily discloses significant water data, including our water-related performance, targets, and goals, in our annual Sustainability Report and on our website at www.barrick.com/sustainability/environment/water. This data is independently assured, and independent assurance statements are published on our website. These disclosures include the following data, by site:

  • Total water abstracted, by water source, and by quality;
  • Total water consumed by consumption source;
  • Total water diverted;
  • Total water to task;
  • Total water reused and recycled; and
  • Total water discharge, by water source and by quality.

We also supplement this publicly-available information by voluntarily completing annual CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) questionnaires, which make investor-relevant climate and water security data widely available. In 2023, Barrick maintained a ‘B’ grade for both Climate Change and Water Security, which places Barrick in the ‘management’ scoring band. We also have maintained a strong track record of stewardship. In 2023, the Company did not record any Class 1 Environmental Incidents for the fifth consecutive year since the Merger.(1)

For these reasons, Barrick believes that our transparency associated with water sampling for local communities is industry-leading.

Alleged Controversies Raised in the Proposal

Barrick welcomes responsible and constructive engagement with all of its stakeholders, including its shareholders. However, in this case, the allegations raised in the proposal are premised on assertions that are either outdated, incorrect, or both, as detailed below.

At the outset, we note that the proposal references the decision of the Government Pension Fund Global of Norway (the GPFG) to divest its holdings in Barrick. Not only was that decision made on the basis of conclusions regarding the level of transparency of Barrick’s environmental reporting prior to 2008, the GPFG report containing those conclusions is itself over 15 years old. In addition, the proposal conflates damage and risk, using outdated assertions in the GPFG Report and referring to a risk of damage to make unsubstantiated inferences that damage has occurred. We believe the conclusions of the 2008 GPFG report were demonstrably incorrect when they were first made and, some 16 years later, are outdated and irrelevant when considered against our current sustainability reporting.

The six bullet points contained in the proposal relate to three specific allegations, each of which is addressed below:

Pascua, Chile

It is unclear how the reference to Pascua-Lama’s closure relates to the proposal’s request for the Board to consider undertaking group-wide independent audits. Regardless, contrary to the allegations contained in the proposal, in September 2020, the Chilean Environmental Court found that operations at Pascua did not result in any irreparable environmental damage. An appeal by local farmers to challenge the September 2020 decision of the Environmental Court was rejected.

The reference in the proposal to a settlement of claims by a group of institutional investors regarding Barrick’s disclosures concerning Pascua-Lama is also materially incomplete and misleading. The settlement of the U.S. securities law class action (not a claim by a group of institutional investors) was entered almost eight years ago in June 2016 before the merits of any allegations regarding misleading statements were established.

Veladero, Argentina

Veladero maintains, with the help of local authorities, an extensive ground and surface water monitoring system both onsite and offsite which extends more than 200 kilometers downstream of the operation. We take more than 500 monthly water samples from 122 unique sampling locations, including from 20 boreholes surrounding the valley leach facility, and we reuse and recycle 97% of our site water. Local government officials have total oversight of our extensive testing process and conduct approximately 30 inspections each year.

We have found that this comprehensive monitoring regime, coupled with quarterly participatory monitoring sessions which the local community is invited to attend, have allayed concerns from local stakeholders relating to three historic incidents at Veladero that occurred between seven and nine years ago. Of these, only an incident that occurred in September 2015 resulted in an out-of-containment release, and this incident was promptly and transparently reported by Barrick to environmental authorities. Environmental monitoring conducted immediately by the Company and by an independent third-party demonstrated that the 2015 incident posed no risk to human health in downstream communities. In addition, the San Juan Government commissioned the United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) to conduct an impact assessment after the 2015 incident. Likewise, the UN assessment concluded that the incident did not cause any impact on the lower watershed areas where the communities are situated.

More recently, in November 2022, Barrick refuted false allegations made by a local NGO alleging that spills occurred in 2021 and 2022. Barrick prepared a detailed and thorough response to these allegations which is available on our website at www.barrick.com/operations/veladero/unhrc, as well as published on the United Nations Human Rights Commission website. In addition, both the San Juan Ministry of Mining and San Juan Governor have reviewed all monitoring data, and both have publicly denounced claims that an incident had occurred.

Pueblo Viejo, Dominican Republic

Contrary to the allegation in the proposal that the ESIA for the Naranjo Tailings Storage Facility at the Pueblo Viejo mine was withheld for nine months, the ESIA was released by Barrick without delay upon the completion of the ESIA process.

As explained above, ESIAs are undertaken by a multi-disciplinary team of independent experts. The comprehensive ESIA for the Naranjo Tailings Storage Facility was the product of a comprehensive, robust, and careful assessment performed over a period of 28 months, which included more than 3,000 community engagements and two open public participation meetings. Despite the opportunity to participate in this process, the authors and sponsors (including NGOs that are linked to and work closely with Ekō) of the so-called expert report referenced in the proposal refused to engage in the consultation process, to meet with Barrick, or to even visit the mine site. The process ultimately saw us choose a location for the Naranjo Tailings Storage Facility that was economically more costly, but which best fit the recommendations of the ESIA.

As publicly disclosed in the Company’s press release of October 3, 2023, Barrick has conducted a thorough review of the report referred to in the proposal and has concluded that it lacks supporting data, facts and analysis, was not subject to peer review, and is in large parts contradictory. Shareholders are encouraged to review the detailed reasons for these conclusions, which are fully set out in our press release at www.barrick.com/operations/pueblo-viejo.

Conclusion

In light of Barrick’s well-established commitment to water management and use, as enshrined in our Environmental Policy and standalone Water Policy, our existing monitoring, public engagement, and transparent public disclosure commitments, and our industry-leading approach to water management, we believe that adoption of this proposal is not necessary, not even dictated by prudence. Moreover, it would divert and waste corporate resources with no corresponding benefit to Barrick, the wider environment, our host communities, or any other stakeholder. Accordingly, the Board recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST this proposal.

  1. Class 1 – High Significance is defined as an incident that causes significant negative impacts on human health or the environment or an incident that extends onto publicly accessible land and has the potential to cause significant adverse impact to surrounding communities, livestock or wildlife.

 

2024 DIGITAL INFORMATION CIRCULAR (Interactive Proxy Statement)